Re: Two Homepage Changes

JP, after reading your post about the images, I went back to look at them on my home page. While they could be reduced further, it was during the act of looking at them all that I spotted an essay by Erndog, whose work I had never read before. I now have several new sci-fi books to try that may be along similar themes to mine. I might have spotted the essay on the old site anyway, but the image caught my eye.

Of course, if we're going to dedicate space to images, new users should definitely be encouraged to use images, since the sea of generic red book covers from so many authors is just background noise to me. I rarely notice them. I'm guilty of judging a book by its cover, but with so much to read.... New users should also be encouraged to make their Book Content Summary as informative as possible, as if they were writing the back cover of their printed book, the target audience, the kind of feedback desired, etc.

Perhaps, a hyperlink called "Not getting enough reviews?" at the top of the homepage of users with suggestions for how to increase reviews....

Dirk

Re: Two Homepage Changes

Maybe it's just me, but I don't see where adding any more works to the front page does anything more than take up space. It only makes folks depend on that and only that to find works to read. Just as on the old site there was constant complaining about not spending enough time on the front page and missing out on reviews, it doesn't make any sense.

The site, we, should be encouraging everyone, new and old members alike, to look at the extremely broad selection of posted works available. The only way to make some folks go beyond the front page in search of material to review is not put it on there at all. Make a link to all the works, latest first, which can be scrolled through with ease (without all the book covers taking up valuable space; they could appear only when you opened the work) to find something of interest - connections and/or favorite authors could be highlighted in some manner. If anyone, new or old, can't find something to review so as to get reciprocation from that list, then they're really not trying very hard imho. Of course it might not hurt to tell new members up front to expect to have to review three or four works for each one they receive, then  they shouldn't be expecting gazillions of instantaneous reviews. Well, that's my thirteen cents worth - inflation, you know. Take care. Vern

28

Re: Two Homepage Changes

Something I would find helpful, maybe in this spirit, maybe against it: Once I have reviewed a chapter of a work, putting new updates to that work in a prominent place.  This way I don't have to explicitly declare a connection and get evern poem, essay, and short story when I am following and reviewing a novel.

What about starting a forum or thread with advice for newcomers?  The first few articles should be carefully composed and maybe subjected to a review process for improvement.

Re: Two Homepage Changes

A couple of clarifying points:

1. The homepage now contains almost as many listings as the old site. In fact, some of the new member content has been in articles and essays which are categories that don't move very quickly and there still haven't been any reviews.

2. New members receive 7.5 points that they can use to post.

3. New members receive a welcome letter that explains the point system, encourages them to post, encourages them to join groups, and also encourages them to say hello in the forums.

I think the suggestion of providing a message after they make their first post is a good one. I'll look into that. I think there are a bunch of other good suggestions here. Thanks!

Sol

Re: Two Homepage Changes

Sol, it could also be worthwhile to rather give new members extra points say for their first 5 reviews of other writers as opposed to everyone on the site including members who has more recip reviews to get to than time and some may not even need the extra points (slow writers like me for example :-) ). I truly believe that part of the problem could be new members not doing reviews for whatever reasons such as being new to this etc. and expecting reviews without actively "looking" and trying to get something going? And something like this may nudge them in the "better/right" direction before they simply give up and leave?

Re: Two Homepage Changes

KHippolite wrote:
vern wrote:

...I don't see where adding any more works to the front page does anything more than take up space. It only makes folks depend on that and only that to find works to read. Just as on the old site there was constant complaining about not spending enough time on the front page and missing out on reviews, it doesn't make any sense.

Othe landing page, there's that yellow box "Find more Books" which lists everything else... I rarely click that. I've hit it maybe six times since the inception of the new site.

Hello, KH, I understand; that's my point. Most everybody depends on the front page, so if something disappears from the front page before it is seen, it just as well have never been posted for a great many folks - probably a vast majority.

If the goal is to get the most exposure for everyone - naïve as that may sound - then the listing on the front page is a deterrent to that end imo. Oh well, to each their own. Take care. Vern

Re: Two Homepage Changes

These are my thoughts:

1. The changes to the front page are awesome, generally speaking.

2. The thumbnail front-cover images do clutter the page a bit, but I think it's correct to have them there. As aspiring/consolidated writers we must start our marketing right from the very workshop process. A good cover is a must, even if it's only for this site.

3. The part showing our connections' bookshelves might be bit too much. I would suggest to put a button which takes you to another page where the bookshelves are shown rather than to clutter the front page even more.

4. The "Articles" and "Essays" part needs to be reduced to the last 5. It's not that people post articles and essays that frequently. BTW, in the case of articles and essays, I would eliminate the book cover thumbnail. Since they are not books, it's unlikely that there would ever exist a book cover for them, even if they are published. For those arguing that the same might be valid for poems and short stories--which are typically published as anthologies--I would answer that many of them do come with illustrations particular to the poem or short story within the anthology. The latter is seldom valid for essays, even the published ones. Articles... well, if they end up in magazines, many times there's an illustration, but it all depends on the article and the magazine. Anyway, I'd eliminate the thumbnail images for Articles and Essays looking forward to uncluttering the front page.

5. Connections didn't exist in the previous site. However, I'm sure that many of us developed some practical way to check whether the people we reciprocated with had published anything new. So, I wouldn't say that a front-page section showing what our connections have published recently is discouraging the reviewal of material posted by newbies.

6. The above said, I'm in favour or providing extra points to anything published by new member under 3 months. Also, I'd suggest to create a new section on top of the page (right below "New Writing to Review from Your Groups") showing the latest 5 works published by members under 3 months, despite whether they are novels, short stories, poems, essays, or articles. All this would increase the attention provided to newbies.

7. A good idea might be that, once a new person signs in, a sort of wizard pops up asking her whether she wants to post in the Premium forum introducing herself. The wizard can guide the newbie who can fill the blanks with her name/pen name, genre, preferred reading, published works (if any) and stuff of the sort about her literary preferences. Blank extra space for personal, optional info could exist too. In the previous site, those newbies who introduced themselves in the "New members" forum often received more reviews than those who didn't.

Kiss,

Gacela

Re: Two Homepage Changes

janet reid wrote:

Sol, it could also be worthwhile to rather give new members extra points say for their first 5 reviews of other writers as opposed to everyone on the site including members who has more recip reviews to get to than time and some may not even need the extra points (slow writers like me for example :-) ). I truly believe that part of the problem could be new members not doing reviews for whatever reasons such as being new to this etc. and expecting reviews without actively "looking" and trying to get something going? And something like this may nudge them in the "better/right" direction before they simply give up and leave?

Janet, this is a great idea! It would be a nice gentle nudge in the right direction for a new members.

Vern, I fully get where you are coming from. If Sol considers this idea I just have one tweak to add to it. And that would be automatic filters for different types of works. Basically links for novels, poems, articles, connections, etc. that would take you to a page filled from top to bottom with the newest works each category has to offer.

Re: Two Homepage Changes

And that would be automatic filters for different types of works. Basically links for novels, poems, articles, connections, etc. that would take you to a page filled from top to bottom with the newest works each category has to offer.

This already exists. The orange buttons under each category on the homepage do this.

Re: Two Homepage Changes

SolN wrote:

And that would be automatic filters for different types of works. Basically links for novels, poems, articles, connections, etc. that would take you to a page filled from top to bottom with the newest works each category has to offer.

This already exists. The orange buttons under each category on the homepage do this.

LOL!! If it was a puppy it would have bitten me on the nose already for not noticing him/her.

Okay, can we change the position of those buttons to the top of each category?

36 (edited by dagnee 2015-04-08 15:44:09)

Re: Two Homepage Changes

Instead of having what our connections are reading and have published at the bottom why don't you highlight new member's writing? Or at least tag the first posting with new writer and give extra points for the first three reviews. Remove them from list as soon as they get three reviews. Also have a buttom at the end the way you do on the other lists we could click to see more new writers.

big_smile

Re: Two Homepage Changes

dagnee wrote:

Instead of having what our connections are reading and have published at the bottom why don't you highlight new member's writing? Or at least tag the first posting with new writer and give extra points for the first three reviews. Remove them from list as soon as they get three reviews. Also have a buttom at the end the way you do on the other lists we could click to see more new writers.

big_smile

Great ideas! - Side note - I would love a like button for the forums so I/others can like the posts we really like. wink

38 (edited by j p lundstrom 2015-04-08 18:05:56)

Re: Two Homepage Changes

njc wrote:

One tip that might help new members is to join a couple of suitable groups and get involved in discussions, especially about reviewed works.

You might also offer some examples of good (that is, useful and constructive) reviews, and explain what's good in the review and what's weak, and showing how different reviews may cover different aspects of a work.

Once again, you are asking the newcomer to know enough to take these steps.  How are they supposed to know?  (I know, I know--flashers, drop-downs, highlighted messages, etc. ad nauseum)  Those are things you pick up with time and exposure to the site and its workings.  What's wrong with building a kindness into the system?

Re: Two Homepage Changes

I finally know what the shelves are for! I think if you changed the word "shelved" to "following" it might be clearer.
Also, I would like the ability to collapse the sections I never review (like poetry and articles)

Re: Two Homepage Changes

KHippolite wrote:

mmm yes. I'd fold everything except connections content, only peeking in the rest from time to time

Taking that a tiny bit further, once folded, have to title bar change color to indicate new entries.

~Tom

Re: Two Homepage Changes

My two cents...

1. I echo putting connections listing at the top. This would help encourage new members to make connections in order to populate their list.

2. One thing I haven't seen suggested, which might be something worth considering, is to adopt a newcomer mentoring program. Hooking newcomers with a premium member for a short set amount of time would go a long way to help teach them the early ins and outs. If you offered bonus points, or $$ off the account fee in exchange for this service, I'm sure plenty of us long timers would be willing to sign up to be a mentor. We could teach them the basics and help introduce them and their works around to our connections. In the very least, we could pound home the reciprocal review concept so they aren't blindsided by lack of response to their postings.

3. Initially, I loved the ideas of covers--now that I see them in practical use, I'm far less enthusiastic. It's not a huge deal either way, but a listing of newly posted works similar to the old site was FAR more appealing. As someone suggested above, the covers could still be seen when you click into a work.

4. Thank you for all you do.

LeeAnn

Re: Two Homepage Changes

As long as we're redesigning the home page for Sol (grin), I suggest adding the genre for works listed on the page. There's enough room next to each work, since the icons are tall enough. I was browsing the latest ten looking for sci-fi stuff. I know it's only a few clicks away, but as long as we're going to display the works on the home page, we might as well add other useful information.

Thanks, as always.
Dirk

Re: Two Homepage Changes

mikira (AKA KLSundstrom) wrote:

[
Vern, I fully get where you are coming from. If Sol considers this idea I just have one tweak to add to it. And that would be automatic filters for different types of works. Basically links for novels, poems, articles, connections, etc. that would take you to a page filled from top to bottom with the newest works each category has to offer.

Thanks for the input. I took for granted that would be the case. Take care. Vern

Re: Two Homepage Changes

SolN wrote:

And that would be automatic filters for different types of works. Basically links for novels, poems, articles, connections, etc. that would take you to a page filled from top to bottom with the newest works each category has to offer.

This already exists. The orange buttons under each category on the homepage do this.

But the orange button exists after a list which is as far as most folks get; they never bother with the orange button. Without that preceding list, the orange buttons would mandate a much broader exposure for all works, not merely the few on the current front page. And lo and behold, all those entries on the front page some are afraid of missing would still be the first ones you see on a more inclusive list.

As noted earlier, I would think the broadest exposure for all works (from new and established members alike) would be the primary goal.  Just clarifying my opinion. But, I'm flexible; I can live with or without the changes; a click here or there is not going to drain all my energy or ruin my day. Take care. Vern

Re: Two Homepage Changes

I doubt others would go for this, but the two lists (if any) I would most like to see on the home page are works from my connections and, to encourage reviews for new members (to keep the site up and funded), a list of new member works. The others I have no use for. I doubt that's true for those who dabble in poetry or essays, etc.

Either get rid of the lists as Vern suggests, or make them collapsible, as others have suggested. Like Vern, I can live with whatever the decision.

Dirk

Re: Two Homepage Changes

We made a few changes you suggested.

1. We reduced the number of slots on the homepage dedicated to articles, essays and shelved books.

2. The writing from new members now pays a 50% bonus for their first month on the site. This bonus is marked on the actual content and we'll be rolling out flags shortly on the homepage and the Read page.

Thanks,
Sol

Re: Two Homepage Changes

Thanks, Sol. Speedy, as always.