njc wrote:Janet, my wisecracker has been straining at its leash. Mostly it wants to mark its territory with hyperbole.
Amy will tell you that my first review of her Cop Shop contest piece came in eight parts, each about as long as the piece. Notice I said my 'first' review.
Never hold back on the wise cracks with me - life's too short! I live for hyperbole, and think it's wholly underrated because some people don't know how to laugh at themselves or don't get hyperbole. Most of the time both. (Only reason I hold back ... hehehe) 
But I digress. Amy is really tough (probably the toughest on the site, but don't tell her, she already suspect I'm slightly jealous of her for this reason!
). I have a thick skin too, not Amy thick, but pretty decent (I think, I'm still talking to K after all hehehe). As long as the intent behind the review is clear, I'll never take anything personally and there is no need to explain anything. I actually loved the The Further Literary Offenses of James Fenimore Cooper reference (Cooper probably didn't, but I did/do - and Cooper should've, I would've taken a Twain review as a massive compliment! LOL).
Honestly, I hesitate sometimes before I read your reviews. But only because you have a knack for pointing out the things I used to think I would never miss and I tend to hit my desk with my head (lots) as I read along your reviews for the gazillion stupid things I do/say/miss ... (It's easy to pick myself up again though ... at least it's not an Amazon review on my published work!!!! LOL) So yes, your reviews, with or without hyperbole, are always appreciated.