I imagine I'm not the only one, but I'm getting a
NET::ERR_CERT_DATE_INVALID
So I can't login from my work computer right now.
Anyway, just making sure it's noted somewhere.
I imagine I'm not the only one, but I'm getting a
NET::ERR_CERT_DATE_INVALID
So I can't login from my work computer right now.
Anyway, just making sure it's noted somewhere.
to which he doesn't answer anyway,
He's a cat. That's their thing. Get used to it.
I figure now's the best time to rename him
Over the years, my cats have been named:
Jinx
Bandit
Smokie
Whiskers
Odysseus/Odie
Nostradamus/Nos
Hel
Esmeralda Weatherwax/Esme
Greebo
Blue
Broccoli
Hope
Sam
Elliott
Prince
WB (pronounced Wub)
Crowley
Castiel
Rayne
Beans
Ajax
Yes, most were indoors only.
No litters, though three pairs were/are siblings.
Most I've had at one time was 7. Current is 5.
I support having a TNBW-based "AI Reviewer" available. Obviously I don't know how difficult it would be to implement, so I can accept it if it isn't. I use Grok to aid my research, and also as an alpha-reader. And I am fully aware of the weaknesses of it in many regards. I do not use it to create. I may bounce ideas off of it, ask if my characters are consistent, or if my hypothetical consequences make sense, but I don't have it rewrite my stuff (and often curse at it when it tries).
I'd think that hunting down people using AI to review would be nigh impossible anyway. I looked at a couple of "AI detectors" recently and one of the biggest complaints was that they were too inconsistent. It is what it is. If someone is burning through a bunch of reviews too quickly, then maybe? I don't know. All I know is I do my reviews by hand, and I'd hope others would do the same for me. I can't control what anyone else does, nor do I wish to. Too "Big Brother" for my taste. (1984, not the TV show. And yes, I've had to make that clarification more than once in RL.)