951

(212 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

njc wrote:

You are understanding me, actually.  But I could modify that and allow the user to decide whether a work merited a new forum thread or not.

Now, that's a good idea. Just a check box marked "Create forum thread(s)" would be all it takes (except for the coding to actually DO it, that is). It could even be an option exercised post-facto - that is, several chapters down the line a author might want to create the thread.

~Tom

952

(4 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Title + (revised) is the option I'm going to take when I do mine.

My 0.02 worth.

~Tom

953

(16 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Norm d'Plume wrote:

...  No one except you sees which of their reviews you've "applied" or not.

Dirk

Ah, that is something I wanted to hear. My fears that at some later date, someone will go through their reviews of my work and see if I've applied any of their suggestions.  But, like JP says, I don't plan on doing that because they are just suggestions.

~Tom

954

(16 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

That certainly is a load off my mind. I didn't want anyone to think I wasn't using the great suggestions that I've been receiving.

I tend to write in bursts of up to 5 or 6 chapters at one stand. I'm retired, so I haven't any restraints on my hours. I also hate to get into the cycle of posting something, fixing it, and then posting again. Like most others, I run the whole thing through until the end. Then I go back and institute the changes I've been taking note of throughout. Even if I don't hit the button. smile

~Tom

955

(16 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

As I was looking over all the reviews I've received, I noticed that only one or two of them had the green "Applied" button showing.  This is definitely not true. I've used input from almost every review to alter or enhance my chapters, I just keep forgetting to click the button to show that I've used the suggestions to good advantage.  Please don't think that I don't care about input.  I do.

I will try my best to remember to do so in the future.

~Tom

956

(13 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Sorry. History, files, and defrag are good things to do (although defragging is really unnecessary from Windows 7 upward). It does nothing towards removing faulty or badly formed cookies.  They have to be removed one at a time unless you have Firefox set to remove all cookies when it closes.  THis is different than having it clear history.

Looks like Dags has your solution. I use the "paste from Word" function all the time.

~Tom

957

(13 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Cleaning your computer and cleaning your cookies are an entirely different thing.

Go to Firefox.

Select Tools -> options
On the Privacy tab, there is a button marked "Show Cookies".  CLick that
In the panel that opens up, there at the top is a "Search" field. Enter "thenext" (without the quotes).
what will show up are just the cookies related to this site.
select ONE cookie and click the "Remove Cookie" button.  DO NOT CLICK THE "REMOVE ALL COOKIES" BUTTON.
When all the cookies for this site are removed, close (shut down) your browser (Firefox) and restart it.  Come to this site and see if your problem has gone away.

~Tom

958

(13 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Ah. That narrows it down considerably. Try the cookie-clearing operation and see if that helps.

~Tom

959

(13 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

No, I meant your browser - do you use Windows Explorer, Firefox, Opera, or what?  I'm not familiar with Windows 7.1. Did you mean Windows 8.1?  The operating system doesn't really matter, but the browser does.  It sounds to me like this site thinks you are a Linux or Mac system or your browser, for some reason, is reporting to the site that you are. Try cleaning out your cookies for this site. You will have to re-enter your username and password, but maybe the correct CTRL-C and CTRL-V shortcuts will come back.

EDIT: You might also check to see if you can cut and paste OUTSIDE your browser (like open a test text file and enter, cut, paste, some keystrokes).  THis will verify that you CAN use those shortcuts, but the site isn't letting you use them.

~Tom

960

(13 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

What are you using for a browser?

~Tom

As an aside, I worked for six months on a computer program involving the Jacksonville (FL) monorail. There are electronic & mechanical safeguards everywhere that refuse to let a train move if just one of them has tripped.  Getting a stuck door (by a foot, for instance) would cause the train to just sit there and electronically call for help. In that instance, all the doors pop back open.

In a lot of SF and Space Opera stories, displaced drivers end up piloting some sort of tramp freighter around asteroids looking for "the big deal".

Cheers,

~Tom

Ah, now I understand better, Dirk.  How about this:

The shipping company, wanting to do everything on the cheap, has slaves only because they are too cheap to buy machinery that IS protected from the dust (premise 'a', above). So, they use slaves instead because their maintenance costs less than new, protected, equipment.

~Tom

Hi, Dirk.

Is this setting a penal colony? If so, then being sentenced to "hard labor" doesn't really NEED a reason to be labor. Back in the old days before the Uniform Code of Military Justice, service confinees were made to dig random holes all over the countryside and then go back and fill them up.  No rhyme or reason, they were just order to do it as punishment.

In your situation, they are apparently slaves, so they are either being punished, or there are other reasons for them to exist. If they are forced to do something that could be done by machines, so what? You could even drive home the fact that they are slaves by letting them see machines also doing their jobs. That would take the fight out of them.

~Tom

964

(34 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Sometimes it isn't possible to point to something and say "this is good and here is why I liked it".  I've done a lot of reviews on another site, and in some cases I got so bogged down in finding errors that I completely missed the point of the story.  On this site, I read the whole post through without trying to find anything.  Then I open a text file on my desktop and make notes of my impression.

Then I go back and look at structure, syntax, punctuation, and grammar, making notes in the text file on this also.  The primary reason for the text file is to remove the "must get to 50 words or I won't get points" temptation.  Another reason for the text file is that I sometimes take quite a while to review. Before, when I was making notes in the review box, I'd find myself getting logged out and have to start again. The text file lets me work at my speed and paste it into the box later.

If there are any 'rules' about doing reviews, I would also like to see them as I am looking to give better reviews also.

There are times when a simple "I loved this!" works very well indeed.

~Tom

965

(10 replies, posted in Romance Inc.)

Janet Taylor-Perry wrote:

Okay, after reading that review--I REFUSE TO GO SEE THIS. And I will not subject my daughter to something so encouraging of staying in a pit of hell.

I just read it also, Janet. I am appalled at something like this could ever make the screen, much less be billed as a 'great film'.

~Tom

966

(10 replies, posted in Romance Inc.)

Probably not. I couldn't finish the first book.

~Tom

967

(4 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Janet Taylor-Perry wrote:

Looks good. Next time though, warn us to expect the change. My eyes didn't compute to my brain at first. Took about 5 seconds for my mind to adjust.  smile I went to the home page before I read the forum post.

Exactly what happened to me, Janet.  I was on my home page, left it for a moment, and then came back.  Huh?  What happened? I don't mind it, but, like you, just a little warning. smile
~Tom

968

(9 replies, posted in Romance Inc.)

Well, the beer was semi-easy to ignore. Back then, you could drink 3.2 beer at 18 in Colorado. It was mostly water.

~Tom

969

(9 replies, posted in Romance Inc.)

janet reid wrote:

But you did see her first before you managed to get closer?!  wink

Seriously though, this was really nice to read!  It's not often you hear of pheromones that still keep going after 52 years!

Thanks, Janet. She was perhaps the second thing I saw when I entered the living room (the first being a giant galvanized tub of iced-down beer). At first she didn't see me but she must have sensed me looking at her because when she looked up and we locked eyes it was all over. The elapsed time from entry to seeing her lasted about three minutes. That spark is still there.

~Tom

970

(9 replies, posted in Romance Inc.)

I have to agree with Dagnee.  When I met my future wife, 52 years ago, I thought she smelled great and had a wonderful bunch of pheromones, which she kept throwing my way.  I was home on Christmas leave from Pensacola and headed to the Azores when my brother talked me into going to a high school party with him.  I, of course, being far superior as having graduated a year earlier, nearly didn't go.  We met and spent the entire evening wrapped around each other.  Back at my house, I told my brother that I'd met the person I was going to marry.  Funnily enough, I found out later that she'd told her best friend the very same thing.

I'm still waiting for the pheromones to wear off.

~Tom

971

(342 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Sol:

It isn't really a bug, but I have seen several reviews that have a title bar and a blank review. It is followed almost immediately by another review by the same person stating, in effect, "I hit the Enter key and posted a blank review".  Would it be possible for the body of the review to be checked and if blank, present a pop-up asking if a blank review is what we meant or wanted?

~Tom

972

(342 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

A couple of little nits from me also: When I first come to the site, the top of the page says "Login". Clicking that produces the drop-down labeled "Login", but the button we press after entering username/password is labeled "Sign in". The next button below that is labeled 'Join", which is not a problem.

My activity drop-down in the upper right corner will automatically drop down on mouse hover in some cases, but not all. In the forums, for example, I have to actually click the button to get the drop-down. It will change color to show the mouse activated it, but not drop down automatically.  I can live with it either way, but it should be consistent.

Tom

973

(19 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I've never had a case of writer's block. At the moment, I have 23 directories on my computer with novels in various stages of completion. Every time I get bogged down on one, I work on another. In one case, I worked closely on two novels and intertwined them at the middle and then broke back apart in a sort of parallel life.

You just have to find out what works for you and stick with it - adding and subtracting items as necessary. I carry a small spiral notepad in my pocket so I can jot down ideas as you never know where one will come from. My original idea for my current novel came from a couple of Anime pictures and my own experiences.

~Tom

974

(19 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Being totally retired now (at 72), I can sit down at the computer most any time and do some writing. In my head I do revisions, plot shifts, and all sorts of mental gymnastics. They say that mental acuity is enhanced by writing and I firmly believe that because most of the plot is not written down.  I have a list of characters, a local file that is used to nominally lay down a plot, and sort of diagram with the characters and how they interact with each other. I'm always fiddling with that diagram.  But mostly I keep to my computer room and click away. My granddaughter can't believe how fast I type she hears me late into the night.  But, she's 25 now, and can fend for herself. smile

~Tom

975

(9 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I see the new "Home" button (which wasn't really necessary because the left-side logo was a Home button), but I'll be darned if I can find the "show your posts" button.  I just don't see it.

EDIT: Operator Error.  I see it now.  I was looking on the Home page instead of on a forum page.

Tom