76

(12 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I killed off one of my favorite characters, but the book started with his impending death. So it wasn't exactly a spoiler. He gets more page space in the prequel though. wink

Completed Jubes chapter 35

78

(7 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

That's pretty cool, Temple. I could play with that all day.
NJC, the input is at the top- where it says: Visualize a word.

79

(12 replies, posted in Close friends)

I do remember now about the signatures, now that mention it, and thanks for the rest, I’ll keep an eye on where the others fit in the plot. I’ll also check out your changes.

80

(12 replies, posted in Close friends)

Can you tell us how Modrin died? I missed that part of the book because I'm a painfully slow reviewer. Was she poisoned, stabbed, bludgeoned?

81

(12 replies, posted in Close friends)

I find clues everywhere, some I even invent myself. Then shed them when new information comes along. I've never read so many books at once, though, so my powers of deduction are not at their best. wink

If he has a target on his back, then I would think the Catholic Church would want to get him through his tour as quickly as possible. Out in the open like that, even with an armed escort, he'd be vulnerable.

83

(12 replies, posted in Close friends)

Will do my best! I'm usually good at this sort of thing, but I usually sit down with a book and read straight through.

Completed Randy's Carnage in Singapore, chapter 1

Completed inline review of Chapter 31- Souring Seas.

86

(16 replies, posted in Close friends)

The character is more polished, because I think I'm on the 50th rewrite of that book.  Your comments are always a tremendous help. Kelly's "uniform" is a tee-shirt, overalls and Chucks. I state it throughout the novels, but through so many re-writes, who knows anymore. I'll make it clearer.

87

(4 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I had the opposite problem: a very long story I had to break up into two novels.
I think if you alternate the two stories in a compelling way, maybe at least tie them together by the timeline, they will feel like one story. For example, the news of the murders could show up on a tv screen in a chapter about the orphan. Find a way to tie them together using “Easter eggs”. Or you can have a common thread running in the background.
As long as it isn’t a clear break, like first the story of the orphan for half the book, followed by the murder mystery part, you’re fine. In fact, I’m intrigued.

88

(9 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Sol,
I inactivated those four chapters, then reactivated them one at a time and they posted. Maybe it wasn't the hacker, just the "nut behind the wheel" this time. wink

89

(9 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I've used FireFox and Google Chrome same thing. The Publish screen doesn't give me the option to choose groups- it just says it has been sent to them.
I sent the help email address some screenshots.

90

(9 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

It is not giving me that option.
I'll try using Firefox instead of Safari. In the meantime I'll send some screenshots through the email helpline.

91

(9 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Sol,
I'm not sure if this is due to the hacker or not. I've gone through a major revamp of my latest novel and deactivated it while making changes. I've made the changes, and published four chapters, but the chapters do not show up- the points were taken, the button says the are active, but the novel itself is inactive. And on the Publish Page, there is no "groups" to publish to. I've never encountered this before. Am I missing something?

92

(8 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

What about climbing down from a tree. You wouldn't descend the tree. If it requires hands and feet, I think "climb" is the appropriate verb- whether you are going up or down.

93

(281 replies, posted in Alpha to Omega - Review Group)

I think the really scary thing is the power Amazon has in the publishing market (as well as every other market). our economy keeps shrinking down to only a few corporations that own and distribute everything. Our choices are being syphoned away, bit by bit as companies consolidate and buy up competitors. I was in Kroger yesterday and noticed the store brands are taking up more and more of the shelf space. The anti-trust laws are not doing their jobs. Just look at the cable companies.

94

(18 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

vern wrote:

I'm not sure why the omniscient narrator (POV) seems to be taboo among many reviewers. Many best selling and well received works were/are written in omniscient POV.  It is a time tested method of narrating a story. I like that freedom to show things from all sides without being told "you can't do that, it makes my head hurt" or such. Everyone has preferences and what works for the author is really the deciding factor although if said author finds overwhelming opposition to the way it is presented, then they might wish to rethink their decision. You will never know unless you go down that road. Good luck. Take care. Vern

I so agree with you, I'm getting tired of trying to defend it in my own story.

I think being all good all the time could be a flaw-one worth pursuing. I'm thinking about the Lucy show when she and Ethel swore to each other they would not lie, and all the horrible things that happened due to telling the truth all the time. For every sin, you can find ways to exploit how being sin- free can wrack it's own havoc and cause it's own complications. It will be tricky, but if you turn "good" on it's ear, it could be very interesting.

Christine Dreier wrote:

Thanks so much,  Jeff. Magical realism was what came first to my mind but that seemed to lead readers to believe it was fantasy. In so many ways magical realism fits the bill as the worlds per se are historical, real, while magical/fantastical elements come into play here and there.  As the story progresses,  my MC will come to see these fantastical elements as real, and they do belong to her adopted world.  I'll take a closer look at speculative fiction. That genre had never crossed my mind. Cheers, Christine

Hey Christine,
your novel sounds very similar to mine, and I've been interested in this thread to find out where you land. My book series also takes place in a real place and time, with the supernatural elements only gradually introduced, hardly there in the first novel, strengthening in novel two and full blown in the third. I was at a loss as to where to place it as well. It is character driven. Takes place in the southern Appalachian area during the Depression. But it can't be classified as historical, because it is not about the time period- that's just the window dressing. There's a mysterious murder, but it's not really a mystery because the killer is known and the investigation takes place in the background. I was going to go with Southern Gothic, but I'm not sure that fits either.

CJ

Hey Stefanie,
I will give your revisions a "look-see" as soon as I can.

98

(62 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Dallas Wright wrote:
C J Driftwood wrote:
Dallas Wright wrote:

-ly adjectives weren’t my point either,  that’s why it was made as a parenthetical comment.  Might reread it.  I was addressing principally tags other than “said.”   Also, I think you miss the point of dialogue tags.  They are supposed to be boring.  They are supposed to disappear.  99% of the time, their purpose should be to identify the speaker - period.  If you are routinely using them for other purposes, you need to study up on effective dialogue.  Your objective should be to make the tags as inconspicuous as possible.  Clever tags draw attention to the tags, not the dialogue  (and away from the story).   When you embrace this, you will be one step closer to masterful dialogue. If you turn your back on it, your dialogue will sound amateurish.  Just the way it is.

There is nothing wrong with using a tag to explain how something is said. The use of "said" doesn't disappear. It becomes a repeat to some readers ears (like mine).

http://blog.writeathome.com/index.php/2 … -say-said/

I stand corrected.  My sources are my colleagues in the field of professional editing. I should be reading more sources like blogs called “write at home.”  Who knew?  Thank you for enlightening me.

I’m not trying to impress your colleagues. Or even you. Sorry you found my link so disappointing and hilarious. I’d love to be enlightened by one of your own postings, but woe and behold nothing there. And only two reviews by you, that I can see. You like better to incite than inform.
I’m here to improve my writing, I’m not sure why you are.

99

(62 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Deckland Oz wrote:
C J Driftwood wrote:

There is nothing wrong with using a tag to explain how something is said.

The problem with explaining dialog, or explaining anything in fiction, is that it robs the narration of transparency. Because narrative transparency is considered a virtue among contemporary literary critics, the use of dialog tags and associated modifiers is frowned upon, while the style of a Cormac McCarthy is celebrated. This is a natural product of artistic evolution and, like it or not, if you want to operate in the world of literary fiction on a professional level, must be honored. It's worth noting, however, that the "rules" applied to literary fiction and those which influence genre fiction are somewhat different, and such is abundantly clear to anyone who reads much of both. That said, I'll agree with Dallas and say that, while the occasional dialog tag is acceptable, though best minimized, explaining dialog is amateurish in any work of fiction.

On that topic, I very highly recommend the following seminal work on the subject of contemporary literary style, as it details the evils of explaining in lucid perfection; every aspiring writer ought read this book:

https://www.amazon.com/Self-Editing-Fic … 0060545690

This is not my argument, I agree, you shouldn’t have to explain dialogue. But if someone is yelling, why would you use “said”. Use “yelled”. If they are whispering, say that the are whispering. If they are “demanding” let them demand. Or are you all saying the author should spend precious word count explaining their body language every time they are not simply “saying” something. I get that one should cut tags, ask anyone I review? But there are better words than just said, in some situations.

100

(62 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Dallas Wright wrote:
C J Driftwood wrote:

I agree abou thte -ly adjectives weighing down your tags, but that's not what Dirk was talking about. He was talking about using a different verb- instead of "said" use "snapped".

-ly adjectives weren’t my point either,  that’s why it was made as a parenthetical comment.  Might reread it.  I was addressing principally tags other than “said.”   Also, I think you miss the point of dialogue tags.  They are supposed to be boring.  They are supposed to disappear.  99% of the time, their purpose should be to identify the speaker - period.  If you are routinely using them for other purposes, you need to study up on effective dialogue.  Your objective should be to make the tags as inconspicuous as possible.  Clever tags draw attention to the tags, not the dialogue  (and away from the story).   When you embrace this, you will be one step closer to masterful dialogue. If you turn your back on it, your dialogue will sound amateurish.  Just the way it is.

There is nothing wrong with using a tag to explain how something is said. The use of "said" doesn't disappear. It becomes a repeat to some readers ears (like mine).

http://blog.writeathome.com/index.php/2 … -say-said/