All taken care of now. Changing the numbers put the chapters in proper chronological order. I just had to issue a note in front of Chapter 27 not to read it until having read the new Chapter 26. Whew. Thanks for the help, JP and Ann.
302 2017-08-21 19:05:51
Re: Oops! (13 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
JP - I did change the numbers of the chapters, so Chapter 27 comes before Chapter 26, but they're still out of order.
303 2017-08-21 19:00:43
Re: Oops! (13 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Too much work, Ann! ![]()
304 2017-08-21 17:10:55
Re: Oops! (13 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
JP - I didn't want to drop a chapter and then add it again. When you post a chapter, the last chapter posted is given, and the arrow only goes one way. Unless I'm missing something, there doesn't appear to be a way to change chapter numbers to reflect an earlier chapter - like making Chapter 27 Chapter 26.
305 2017-08-21 16:56:58
Re: Oops! (13 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Well, the chapter I just posted isn't up on the site yet. It'll be titled Kang's idea. Again, please read that before reading Negotiations.
306 2017-08-21 16:53:21
Topic: Oops! (13 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
I made a big mistake in posting chapters for The Telltale Tattoo - I forgot to post a chapter! So when you come to the second-to-last chapter posted so far, please read the last chapter first. The site won't let me change chapter numbers, so Chapter 27 is actually Chapter 26 and Chapter 26 is actually Chapter 27. Sorry about that, peeps. I got all discombobulated by going to the PGA golf tournament last week. At least, that's my excuse, and I'm sticking with it. ![]()
307 2017-08-05 14:54:01
Re: Did Your Childhood Dream Come True? (5 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
All my childhood dreams/aspirations came true though, by necessity, it took decades to realize them all! ![]()
308 2017-08-04 15:20:19
Re: The agony of waiting for acceptance or rejection (21 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Yeah, but you had to go to Facebook, where they would be outed. That's why you then got the response you should have had at the beginning.
309 2017-08-04 12:26:18
Re: The agony of waiting for acceptance or rejection (21 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
On the other hand, publishers say they will reject out of hand any submissions not meeting their requirements, so if this were the reason for Bill's rejection, I wonder why they even bothered to respond, or why, on doing so, they didn't say that was the reason.
310 2017-08-04 12:16:00
Re: The agony of waiting for acceptance or rejection (21 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Good point, Dags. Nine minutes is just long enough to spot a miscue in the submission and send back the rejection. Not nearly enough to read the letter, blurb, etc. think about it and then reject.
311 2017-07-27 12:22:02
Re: Bran new (6 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Welcome, David. I hope you'll find your time here as rewarding as I have.
312 2017-07-26 00:31:50
Re: Another Review for The Kurdish Connection (10 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Thanks for the strokes, Randy. ![]()
313 2017-07-25 17:37:57
Re: Another Review for The Kurdish Connection (10 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Congratulations, Randy. That's why you're my favorite thriller writer (in fact, my only thriller writer, as I usually don't like that stuff.)
Aw, gee. ![]()
314 2017-07-15 21:18:42
Re: Letters from Mars by Justin Robben (6 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
In another Forum thread, there's a discussion about ways writers could earn more reviewing points. The zero points your posting rewards a reviewer would tend to turn away potential readers of your story, M.J''s and M.D.'s kind words notwithstanding. You're obviously serious about the craft, and this site can help you hone it - if there's an inducement (points) that makes the valuable time spent by a reviewer worthwhile. Since you are a member of Premium, where most of the good reviewers reside, perhaps it's your settings that should be checked. Make sure that you allow anyone who is a member of ANY of your groups to review and receive points for doing so.
315 2017-07-13 11:52:32
Re: Rewarding extra points to the best reviewers? (19 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
2000 points??? 3000 points??? Wow! Do you guys only review and never publish?
I'm like Seabrass. I'm always short on points.
Kiss,
Gacela
I've posted 8 novels on TNBW and am working on my ninth, so it's not for the lack of posting I've accumulated the points. ![]()
316 2017-07-12 12:26:36
Re: Rewarding extra points to the best reviewers? (19 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
I've been here since 2008, Dags. That helps! ![]()
317 2017-07-11 22:54:13
Re: Rewarding extra points to the best reviewers? (19 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Seabrass - You could maybe try posting shorter chapters.
You'll get more reviewers, methinks. I'm retired, so I have the time to read a long chapter - especially if it's well-written. But others might be intimidated by, or have an attention level that can't survive, a lengthy review. I know from experience that your reviews are both thoughtful and eagle-eyed. I try to do the same with my reviews. It's just math. Do more reviews, get more points. I've got over 4000 points that never seem to go down. Each chapter I post costs me an average of 6-8 points, and every chapter I review gains me 1.2 - 3 (yours!) points. So you have to review more than you post. I like the system Sol has set up, though maybe the points for reviewing versus the points to post could be tweaked to make it a tad easier to post.
318 2017-07-07 23:12:49
Re: Ann Everett's Blog (9 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Good interview, Randy. I'm so glad you found a publisher who believed in you and your stories. And Ann Everett - thank you for offering the platform for TNBW writers! That goes above and beyond. I'm looking forward to Sept. 22!
319 2017-06-26 15:27:47
Re: I need a few good conspirators... (11 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
I'll give it a go, Ryan.
320 2017-06-26 15:24:48
Re: Breaking the 4th Wall (12 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
Some would say speaking to the audience - in an aside way, not just a self-descriptor, a la, "I hate spinach," by the first-person narrator - is wrong. But a few well-known writers, Harlan Coben among them, do this frequently. It's like they're bringing the reader into the club, as it were, to participate with the character, rather than being a passive observer. Personally, I try to avoid this, though sometimes I let an aside slip in. ![]()
321 2017-06-19 14:08:36
Re: Back from the dead - not really (3 replies, posted in Cop Shop)
Welcome back, Allen!
322 2017-06-16 21:09:08
Re: pop cop quiz # 31 Know Your Sleuth (5 replies, posted in Cop Shop)
OMG. I Googled them. I didn't know Harry Bosch was in a TV series. Amazon TV, but still! An iconic character created by Michael Connelly.
323 2017-06-16 20:55:28
Re: pop cop quiz # 31 Know Your Sleuth (5 replies, posted in Cop Shop)
Oops. Some of my answers must be wrong, because I can't think of any TV shows for them. Perry Mason, Dragnet, and Spenser are the only ones I can think of. Sorry for not reading all the rules!
Oh, and Raymond Burr, Jack Webb, and Robert Urich were the actors in those shows.
324 2017-06-16 16:59:45
Re: pop cop quiz # 31 Know Your Sleuth (5 replies, posted in Cop Shop)
(Not sure about #4)
1. Hercule Poirot
2. Miss Marple
3. Nick and Nora Charles
4. Perry Mason
5. Lord Peter Wimsey
6. Nero Wolfe
7. Spenser
8. Joe Friday
9. Nancy Drew
10. Harry Bosch
Extra credit: Colombo
325 2017-06-07 12:34:50
Re: Well, that was succinct. (3 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)
There's a middle ground, Denise, between being agented and self-publishing. (And, BTW, having an agent doesn't ensure you'll get published.) That is small- to medium-sized publishers who don't require an author to have an agent before reviewing a manuscript. In fact, these publishers would prefer you not have an agent to get between you and them and muddy the waters. Anyway, it's another option.