51

(22 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Welcome, Iris,

If you want to get over your fear of vulnerability, this is the place. Here, everything you write is awesomeness wrapped in incredible. That's may sound snarky--and it is--but it's not a bad thing. A writer's ego is as fragile as a dandelion (not those yellow ones; the white fluffy ones that disintegrate at the slightest breeze.)

What is your preferred genre? What POV do you usually write in? If you were on a deserted island, what book would you want with you?

The three secrets to being a successful writer: Taste the world--experience things outside your comfort zone; Know the audience for whom you are writing; Never lose your passion; if you love it, your reader will feel that in your words and they will love it too.

vern wrote:

You're not supposed to see the safety pin; it's under the chicken, invisibly holding it in place kind of like the strong nuclear force. Take care. Vern

Be careful, Vern, or you will start a new religion.

corra wrote:
A.T.Schlesinger wrote:

corra: TL/DR

Here's the abstract:

That insanely long post was about Taurus divided by the member of the KKK before wash day? I may have to go back and read it--when I have a free week.

Vern: I see no safety pin. But then I also see no God, and a lot of people say that's  a thing too.

Max: A little heavy on the adjectives, but a worthy effort.

corra: TL/DR

Vern: I'm pleased you finally got an avatar. But one question; is that a really small person wearing the top of an acorn?

corra, Dill...I am stunned.

How can either of you have been offended by anything I wrote? That was, at worst, playful banter.

This business demands a thick skin. You will read horrible, hurtful reviews of books you have poured your heart and soul into. (Not on TNBW, mind you; here it's all 5 stars and the greatest thing ever written ever.)

Out in the real world, 8 out of 10 of your reviews will be from people who have not read more than a page of your book, hate their life, hate you for having the creative force and resilience to even write a book, and would enjoy crushing your spirit more than free porn and a chocolate sundae. If "How did my topic get into a "I love the Bronte Sisters more than you" duel?" actually offended you, may I humbly suggest you take up needlepoint from a cave in Outer Mongolia? --because you will read far worse from people far more cruel than I could ever be.

Of course, it's fine to deviate from the OP. There are no rules.

William Shakespeare wrote:

If we shadows have offended,
Think but this, and all is mended,
That you have but slumbered here
While these visions did appear.
And this weak and idle theme,
No more yielding but a dream,
Gentles, do not reprehend:
If you pardon, we will mend...

"Testy, testy," said the urologists.

corra, I just want to be sure--because it is important to the OP--you do know that "F/F" refers to lesbian fiction, right? Maybe also non-fiction.

I am no expert on Bronte, but the time period they wrote in didn't tolerate much F/F in mainstream writing.

In any case, please enjoy this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NKXNThJ610

How did my topic get into a "I love the Bronte Sisters more than you" duel?

58

(17 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I am stunned and honored just to be mentioned in such fine company.

Beneath the Silver Rose has been my passion for over 6 years. I have despaired, rejoiced, given up and charged ahead so many times, I've lost count--and sometimes in the same afternoon.

Special thanks to those who read and offered their insights.

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/Anastazja_2007/tumblr_mwinzg0Aem1qdlh1io1_400_zps8empg3bt.gif

59

(1,634 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Landry day.

I about had a heart attack this morning.

(This is probably not going to be a problem, but employing Murphy's Law, I feel I need to red flag it.)

If you go to the Rules tab on the Strongest Start 2016, you will see this:

The work is officially considered entered if it appears on official entry list visible here:

http://www.thenextbigwriter.com/contest … ion+2016-5

However, if you copy and past that web site, you are taken to the Strongest Star list for 2015, not 2016!

Now, the "Entries" tab will bring you to the correct list, but if one or more of Final Round Judges should do what I did--thus the heart attack I got this morning--she would be reading the wrong list of books.

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/Anastazja_2007/10492564_767810216661277_4028133915405638110_n_zpsslp38ewd.jpg

Dill, Bulwer-Lytton will rot your brain. Use with caution.

Thank you all for your insights. It does give me some hope that the artist is not necessarily the art, although I think the narrow-mindedness of mortals do tend to go that way. Why else did we scoff at Elton John singing:


Oh Nikita you will never know, anything about my home
I'll never know how good it feels to hold you
Nikita I need you so


...only to learn later that "Nikita" is a common name for a male in Russia, and so all was once again correct in the universe.

But then we learn that Bloomsbury, at first, made J.K.Rowling hide her gender because "Boys don't want to read books written by girls."

Tell Me, Have You Seen The Yellow Sign?

We are often a small and ignorant species. Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/Anastazja_2007/The_Yellow_Sign_zpsgqrdj7z1.jpg

62

(4 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

In the previous TNBW site, there was a thriving and active section on erotic stories and poems. As far as I can tell, no such things here.

Is that a decision by The Powers That Be or or there no interest?

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/Anastazja_2007/54471552_zpshq3aiucv.jpg

A hypothetical situation:

You are recommended a book by a few friends, a story about a lesbian romance. The author's name is, let's say, J.P. Ericson (I just made that up; apologies to any J.P.Ericsons out there.)

You read the blurb. Looks like an interesting story.

You read the first few lines. Nothing about a dark and stormy night. A clever use of a metaphor. The author has some skills. All good. Green lights across the board.

You look at the author's bio--and see that J.P.Ericson is James Patterson Ericson.

Do you put the book back--or take it to the counter/download it to your Kindle?

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/Anastazja_2007/1924922_671650509606552_6541013059023186647_n_zpshirg35uc.jpg

Hello all!

I invite you to read/review my entry into The The Strongest Start Book Competition.

https://www.thenextbigwriter.com/postin … rt-1-22656

Beneath the Silver Rose is an adult, low-magic, medieval fantasy. No dwarves or elves, no dragons. Magic is rare and wonderful.

The book uses the Deep POV writing style. If you've heard of this and want to see it in action, this story will be of particular interest for you. 

Enjoy!

You're sleeping in your grandmother's old house. Her funeral was today. A distant door creaks open. Just the wind? Yeah, that's all it was. Go back to sleep.

You hear a step creek and then another. More, closer and closer. Some--one?--is in the hall. You huddle under the covers. Will you see the dawn again? Will you ever leave this house?

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/Anastazja_2007/haunted_house_zps3youm1s3.jpg

It doesn't have to be The Thing In The Dark.  Fan fiction about Gomez and Morticia would be great! Or how about Freddy Kruger meeting Kim Davis! Oh God, I would read that!

Bring back the Halloween contest! I don't even care if there are prizes! I can't go trick-or-treating any more. This is all I have left!

66

(5 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

...will be a secret no longer after this posting, but--c'est la vie--some things are too good to keep to one's self.

If you are anything like me, your mistakes are invisible when you are looking at your computer screen. Words left out, --ing words when they aren't required (which should be most of the time--an argument for another day) and even that all-important rhythm can be easily overlooked. This is because we read the words in our mind, not on the screen, and in our mind they are perfect. Ego is our greatest asset and enemy. 

Get an e-reader and transfer your book to it. For some reason, seeing your words in a different format will make your errors stand out like a black fly on a wedding cake.

And now the great secret...

As you read, make notes in an mp3 player or some recording device. Only later, at your 'puter, do you make the corrections as you listen to your own sweet voice in your head on headphones.

I make notes like this:

"Small change. This is when Sha and Dee are first below the palace. When Sha asks where the passage of the Eye is looking at goes, Dee says, "I don't know." Instead, let's have Dee say she's explored the hall to the twisting steps down, but no further. This will make the reader curious what's down there. Find this by Sha asking "What's down there?"

Important to make some note of where you saw the correction, that you can easily find with a search.

Carrying an MP3 recorder has the additional advantage of allowing you a quick note when an idea pops in your head.

The only drawback to this system is you become dependent on it. Should you forget your MP3 recorder, you will feel like Darth Vader just cut off your hand.

Memphis Trace wrote:
A.T.Schlesinger wrote:

As topic.  Do the old forums still exist in any form? I had some great stuff there.

This link https://old.thenextbigwriter.com/forum/index.php used to get you there.

Memphis Trace


Thank you Memphis!

It was great reading some of my old stuff and the responses. I especially liked this one:

http://old.thenextbigwriter.com/forum/v … p?id=18998

A.T.Schlesinger wrote:
jaames wrote:

The problem is, that dating put the shroud at around the 1400-1500's. Nowhere near the time of Christ. So, who cares who it was?

Who cares?  About 300,000,000 people.  The science is solid; this thing has been carbon dated as existing 1000+ years after the life of Jesus.  It does not matter. 

In this story I envision, an eccentric billionaire is financing a cloning lab.  He hires people to steal the shroud.  That's the first few chapters.  His scientists know this is not the blood of Christ, but they are getting a shit load of money to shatter a scientific barrier, so they keep it quiet (except for one who succumbs to morals, rushes into the billionaire's office and tells him "the truth"--and is shocked to hear the man say, "Yeah, I know.  So what?"


Open your writer's eye and see the scene when the Trump-like billionaire holds his press conference.  Cameras flashing.  Reporters elbowing each other, shouting questions.  Noise and chaos.   They expect him to announce a new casino in space or something.  The billionaire starts to speak.   When he tells them what he has done, the room falls silent.  Papers drop to the floor. Godalmighty!  That scene would be fun to write! 

So they clone the DNA from the blood.  Now, we cannot wait 20+ years for the New Jesus to grow up, so there has to be some sort of accelerated growth.     

And there has to be twists.  The boy has to be special.  Maybe even dangerous.  Religious fanatics have to try and kidnap him.  They need to succeed, much to their demise. 

Oh!  I'm getting excited!

Elisheva Free wrote:

Thing is, the authors were obviously aware of these rules and went against them with intention.-Elisheva

Oh yes, absolutely. Stephen King shatters his own rules often. 

Therein lies the rube. When you're established and have a loyal following, you get piss all over the rules.  But just starting out? No, sorry.

About speech tags.  I know I am preaching here and I don't mean to offend anyone. This is Writing 101. 

Speech tags such as yelled, shouted, exclaimed, added (I love that one--it was a hard habit to break), explained, reported, etc--all these are the crutches of a lazy writer.

Writing 101:

Rodger opened the door and found his wife in bed with his best friend.

"What the hell are you doing?" he shouted.

"See?" his wife smirked. "I told you he's an idiot."

The problem: Can you imagine Rodger saying "What the hell are you doing?" in any other way than a shout? And it's so hollow!

He slammed the door and his hands became fists. "What the hell are you doing?"

His wife smirked. "See? I told you he's an idiot."

(...and don't even get me started on "smirked."  How does anyone smirk words? You can smirk and then say words or say words and then smirk. But try smirking and talking.  Try it now.  Seriously.)

Again, writing 101 and I don't mean to lecture or preach.  But "He slammed the door and his hands became fists" is so much better than "he shouted."

Yes?

janet reid wrote:

There is only one rule for writing: All rules are guidelines! wink

True.  If you and your friends are the only ones you want to read your books. I am far too pussy whipped by the system to ever believe this.

1. You must not write in Third person omniscient.
2. You may not use too many adjectives.
3. You may not switch POV in Third person, single point of view.
4. You must avoid "was" whenever possible. You may never use "very" except in dialogue. 
5. You may not use any speech tag other than said, asked, answered or replied. 

Sure, break these rules. Be a rebel. Maintain that your vision and power and passion of your storytelling will trump all these pointless guidelines. This is YOUR art, YOUR way. To hell with what readers,  publishers, agents and editors want.

Have fun on your little island with a single palm tree. Maybe a cruise ship will pass by and see you.


Norm d'Plume wrote:

It remains to be seen how well I'm handling withholding of information. Two of my characters share a secret and pretend that they don't. And I don't want the reader to even know there is a secret.

I have not read what you are talking about, but based on what you've said here, your setting yourself up for a big fall. The only way for this to work is to introduce a THIRD character who doesn't know the secret and stay with that person all the time. Even writing something like:

Jennifer rubbed her hands in anticipation. When Bill discovered the secret she was keeping, he'd either run screaming into the hills or ask her to marry him right there and then. Just two more days. This was going to be so good!

Nope.  Can't do it. Won't work.

Of course, you can always try. I dare you to prove me wrong.

Elisheva Free wrote:

I've also just finished the most recent Game of Thrones, but I'm a bit peeved at it right now, so we're just going to exclude it from the list.-Elisheva

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/Anastazja_2007/10532538_875444585866933_2352568786588438202_n_zpsxknip3fk.jpg

njc wrote:

And yet writers have made it work!

Name one.

I know, no one had time to sneeze in this day and age, but I wanted to point a giant red arrow at 3 fantastic TV series that may have slipped past some of your radars. All are historical dramas, very violent (sex, nudity, blood, gore--hey, it was the Times of Yore. Waddya expect?)

First is:

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/Anastazja_2007/Outlander-the-story-continues-key-art-1_zpsoymiuyse.jpg

A 20th Century woman finds herself 200+ years in the past in 18th century Scotland. The time-travel aspect is down-played. This is mostly a romance. Has the MOST HATED villain I have seen in any--ANY--movie or TV program. Jonathan "Black Jack" Randall  (You will hate him more than Archibald Cunningham from "Rob Roy". Yeah.)

Second is:

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/Anastazja_2007/BS1_zpsdrrhiug7.jpg

Pirates of the Caribbean--GoT style!  This ain't no Johnny Depp thing.  Bloody.  Fantastic story telling!



Last is:

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/Anastazja_2007/vikings-640x347_zps4esonn4r.jpg


All I can say is they got a camera, a ring of invisibility and a fookin time machine! That's the only way I can accept how real this looks.  (And someone put a Babble Fish in my ear while I slept for the language.) Hands down the most amazing female protagonist ever, ever EVER!

Lagertha

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/Anastazja_2007/6c1246bd71d82af0f4f4c11dd2898f26_zpslxp1n4pn.jpg


If you have not seen these shows, do it! Movies are dead.  TV is where it's at, my friends. 

(Books are still good, too. Especially mine, available --I hope--in a few months)

73

(5 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

Great pictures!

Funny thing about Lineage II (I never played the game) but I always assumed there was a super-epic-awesome story to go with those cinematics. Turns out...no, not really, or so I am told. The awesome cut scenes are unrelated and have little to do with the game. Weird.

I love pictures that just make you want to write a story. Like this:

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/Anastazja_2007/well_zps3f756123.jpg

Or this, for a touch of the erotic:

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/Anastazja_2007/robot.jpg

KHippolite wrote:

Indeed. #4 doesn't leave much room for talking about the scene

I must disagree. You can "talk about the scene" (may I assume you mean describe a scene?) in action. You don't need to say it's raining and describe what a rainy street looks like.  Have your characters interact with the rain. You never need to describe a medieval city, even a fantastic, magical city.  Have you characters walk its streets and see the sights through their eyes.

Remember, the character always comes first. This is something George Lucas never understood or forgot. When Obi-won screams in fury, "You were suppose to be the chosen one! I loved you like a brother!" --we felt nothing. Zero.  Just a little 'well, that's how it happened.'

Fail, epic.

njc wrote:

#8 cannot apply to a mystery.

You're thinking of the last line. "And the killer is...THE BUTLER!"

That's not what Vonnegut is saying.  What he's saying is that when we learn it is the butler, we should never go, "No way! It can't be him." Instead, we should say, "Ah, yes. Now I get it! That's so cool!"

You may also be hung up with the phrase "To heck with suspense." Isn't suspence good? How else can we get the reader to want to keep reading! Indiana Jones has to hang from the fraying rope over a pit of hissing vipers.

Vonnegut is not talking about that. He's saying, "Don't hide the important stuff to make suspense."

Think of a murder mystery written in either the first person or the third person, single point of view when we are in the thoughts of the police detective.  We learn on the last chapter that the detective was the killer all along--and you throw the book against the wall and cuss like a truck driver at the author.  Why?  Because you NEVER have point-of-view characters withholding information. How had the POV detective somehow FAILED to even think about the fact that whoops, he murdered Johnny and Susan and Bill and Rodger and it somehow escapes their thoughts for the entire duration of the murder mystery?

75

(5 replies, posted in Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi)

I thought this would be a good idea for a thread.  Inspiration is for movies and images you have come across that give you energy and make you want to write.   Here are two that I would like to offer right away, a picture:

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/Anastazja_2007/mountanfortress.jpg


...and a video:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1j2JPNao-gU