26

(11 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Images can be a problem. I had trouble with some pictures. I had to convert them to .jpg (which was odd, as they were .jpg) before I could post them.

27

(11 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I noticed that two. Three blank ones. An intriguing title, like you may have a publisher for your book. And this is an ampersand. &&& Actually, three of them. I'll remove one. They say three is a crowd. &&

28

(3 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thanks, Dirk.

29

(3 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I've tried this before. I've noticed others have Chapter N, V. 2. And people can get points. The way I've done it in the past is post Ch. N+t, and title it "reallly chapter N, V.2. This creates a disturbance in the chapter numbering, but better than nothing. So how do you publish Chapter N, V. 2, so that people can get points in reading it?  The occasion is that I've taken to heart some new readers' comments and rearranged and added to chapter 1 of "Exile in the Beforetime," and would like to have new feedback. Of course, everyone who has read it can do so out of the goodness of their hearts, I suppose.

30

(260 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Welcome aboard, Lilly. I'm glad you're here. You'll get a lot of thoughtful feedback at this site. Go for it!

31

(5 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Welcome, Neil. This is a friendly, helpful group. I'm glad you're here.

Rachel

Way to go, Randy.

33

(6 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Welcome, John. I look forward to reading your posts.

34

(16 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

That happened to me once with a chapter. Ended up rewriting the whole chapter and liked the results better. I do have my first novel only in print. Didn't back it up. Now, it just sits in my attic as I'm not going to rewrite it on the computer. I backed up my Ph.D. thesis at Kinko's.

I guess what I'm saying is bummer, but make the lemonade. Use this as a way of making your work better. And next time, back up per all those other suggestions.

35

(7 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Wishing you an awesome recovery. And thanks for the words of warning.

36

(6 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Welcome, John. I look forward to reading your stuff.

37

(9 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Welcome, Monica. You'll find this a great site. I look forward to reading your work.

Congratulations, Bobbie. I never read the edited version, but finished the first version and it is a great story. Don't spend too much time on the "deep edit," or on looking for an agent or publisher. Publish it yourself. It will find its audience, even if you don't get rich. And who knows, maybe you will.

Norm d'Plume wrote:

Just sit right back and you'll hear a tale, a tale of a fateful trip
That started from this topic port aboard this tiny ship
The mate was a mighty sailing man, the skipper brave and sure
Five passengers set sail that day on a three hour tour
A three hour tour

Of course it begs the question why the Howells, Ginger, and even Maryanne brought enough clothes to dress differently for almost ever episode. Also, why did Thurston bring a trunk full of cash? Plot holes!

They not only brought enough clothes to dress differently for every episode, they were up with the latest fashions--at least Ginger and Mary Ann were.

40

(11 replies, posted in Close friends)

Yay! Problem solved. Next, Cacela, work on the pandemic. You've got this, girl.

41

(8 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I just read a chapter in a novel relevant to this. It was 1st person POV. The main character is watching a kidnapping go down, intervenes, accidentally shoots a cop but helps the kidnapping victim escape. He describes the old cop reaching for what he thinks is a gun and shoots him. He blows up the kidnapper's vehicle.  The reader goes along with it although wondering why the character, a good guy, is carrying revolvers and worries about him being a cop killer. Turns out to be an alaborate ruse. No cop was killed, they weren't real kidnappers, and the hero was part of the ruse. The reader is fooled, the POV is preserved, and if anything, the reader is relieved. All from 1st person POV, all with the POV character in the know, all with a plausible narrative that he wasn't in the know. You can do this, Dirk.

42

(11 replies, posted in Close friends)

Upwards, downwards, sideways, down. Backwards, forwards, square and round. Where will it end?

43

(8 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Dirk, I suggest reading either Harlen Corben or Lee Childs. They are masters at POV characters thinking about things and keeping them a secret from the reader. In one, Harlen's character was going to reveal something potentially devastating to his wife right before she was murdered. It was a crucial plot point, so Corben didn't want to reveal what it was.

You can do things like "It's you! How can it be you? I didn't want it to be you." And then have the demon eat him or whatever demons do. Or have him go home, shaken, think, "It was him. Damn. Why did it have to be him? And to think I felt like he was--" Knock on the door. Thought interrupted.

Whatever, my point is that there are ways.

44

(1 replies, posted in Close friends)

Bobbie is a very talented writer. I'm glad she got the recognition!

Congrats to Catherine. Congrats to Bobbie and Dagny!

46

(18 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Ray, you have my sympathies.  What an ordeal. Glad you're on the mend. Contact your hospital's financial people. They are often very happy to give you a payment plan for your co-payments and deductible. Follow Catherine's advice and make this fodder for future writing.

47

(14 replies, posted in Close friends)

Bobbie.R.Byrd wrote:
Kdot wrote:

Here's a complicated answer.



I definitely have to go back and change terminology now. I have never wanted to get lumped into the "Star Trek" mold. Making the changes won't be so difficult with find/replace feature. First I have to come up with the terms, however. As for T'Laan - no, he doesn't have a positronic brain. I've not used the term positronic at all, in describing him or anything else.

Thanks for hanging with my little story. I appreciate your input so much!

Bobbie

Star Trek used 50s terminology, quite standard then. The use of some terms, tractor beams, positronic beams warp drive are generic. True, "beaming," is specifically Star Trek, and a new term would be appropriate. But similarity of terms won't slide you into Star Trek per se. H. Beam Piper's technology was almost entirely Asimovian, and there were totally different universes.  I would avoid "Heisenberg compensators," though. lol

48

(14 replies, posted in Close friends)

Bobbie, I read CJ and Kdot first before I understood what you were asking. Some terms are staples in science ficition, originating either in the Golden Age of Science Fiction (1900 to 1950) or in the 1950s. They are common usage, are expected, and as Gacela said of werewolves and vampires, easily assimilated by the reader. In fact, it would be jarring not to use them. Tractor beams are among them (originating, as I said above in the idea there could be an electro-gravitic or magneto-gravitic spectrum.) Hyperdrive is another one. Warp drive originated in the '50s, and as we have achieved it at the subatomic level, a "realistic" projection into the future. (You would need something to amplify the energy output, as to achieve the Starship Enterprise, you'd need, even with antimatter, a mass the size of a tenth of the sun. Why Alcubieere gave up and why they use "dilithium crystal," to amplify the energy. Like lithium crystal as used for lasers. That leads to another SF staple, but 'di,' or 'tri' in front of something--'tritanium' is another example.) Inertialess drive is a less popular term from the 50s. I think I only read it in Poul Anderson but it would still be recognizable and disconcerting to call it anything else. (The exception would be if you named it, although avoid Cochran or other names like it for obvious reasons.) As to pulling you into Star Wars, it depends on the term. 'Lightsaber' is definitely Star Wars. You might want to distance the Flow from the Force for similar reasons. But 'subspace,' (popularized as an alternative to hyper-space (the 4th dimension that you travel in with hyperdrive), 'positronic brain,' not so much. Both the Jump into hyperspace and positronic brain originated with Asimov and are part of the SF world now (Han Solo actually, in the first Star Wars, steals a passage from Asimov's robot novels almost word for word in explaining navigation with hyperdrive.). As to 'computer,' keep computer.  I use 21st-century terms for some of my concepts. 3-D printers, for example. Even if they end up like food synthesizers (Star Trek), we'd probably still call them 3-D printers, just like we call cars, cars, even though they are not horse-driven. 'Automobile' does not fall trippingly off the tongue.

Thanks for the aside to me, Kdot. I think you are right. I haven't used a tractor-beam yet, but I do use 'blaster,' and 'subspace,' both of which are time-honored and the former has a definite meaning (A controlled beam of atomic energy capable of disintegrating anything in its path). I also use the Asimovian term, 'subetheric,' which seems especially appropo as 'ether' was popularized by Madame Blavatsky. 'pulse rifle' is a term of my own, but it's easily identifiable as a ray gun (or phaser, or disrupter, or...) Ray guns, originating with the scientific fad of radionics is a staple. They first appear as the Martian heat rays in War of the Worlds and reached their peak in the 60s with super-heroes using all sorts of rays. (Space Ranger even reversed the process of fire destroying evidence with a special restorative ray.)

The thing is, you need landmarks for the reader. "Conventionalization," to use Spock's term for what the Organians did for the Federation and Klingons. If you feel uncomfortable using common terms, I suggest simply giving their originators (Wells, Smith, Asimov, Schmitz) credit. Or do what Lucas did, assume that anyone who likes your stuff will have heard these terms before.

Hope this helps.

49

(14 replies, posted in Close friends)

CJ. I'm just guessing but you use a tractor to pull something, hence a tractor beam. The term originated, I believe, with E.E. Smith. There was speculation that just like you could combine electricity and magnetism to create the light spectrum, you could combine gravity and magnetism to creating a spectrum of gravity beams. As to hyper-drive. In the '50s, there was a tendency to put 'hyper-' in front of everything to make it sound, well,' hyper. Asimov was the worst culprit. He had hyperwave as well as hyperdrive. In his usage, which George Lucas shamelessly borrowed (I won't say 'stole,' as Asimov became a super-fan of Star Wars), it referred to the 4th physical dimension. The idea is just like a 2-dimensional being could drastically shorten distances between two points if he could jump in a third degree of freedom, 3-dimensional beings could do the same. Hence, "the jump into hyperspace."

50

(14 replies, posted in Close friends)

Hey, Bobbie. I told you this would be a great group to join. I'm so glad you're here. Christine, I am looking forward to getting to know you and your work. A word of advice--post a topic for your books. You will get some great feedback.

Rachel.