Re: Acts/ Dictates/ Mandates/ Mantle - Amy's Thread
Declaim means to recite as for an audience, giving all the inflections and intonations appropriate.
Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi → Acts/ Dictates/ Mandates/ Mantle - Amy's Thread
Declaim means to recite as for an audience, giving all the inflections and intonations appropriate.
Did you get the wave file? I wasn't delaying or ignoring. We've been fighting off lethargy from the recent respiratory bug. I've done nothing but sleep for days.
Yes. See my return email.
Hey, you gave me some info in your reply to my review to help me better understand what's going on. I am quoting your reply here and am commenting on that as more feedback for you.
THINGS I GOT AND DID NOT GET AND WHY: ( AGAIN, THIS MY BE DUE TO MY OR YOUR FAILING--I CAN'T REMEMBER, IN ANY CASE, BUT IT MAY BE WORTH LOOKING INTO )
"Alda says she has worked every job in the temple except cleaning the gutters(not possible in a normal lifetime)." --[OK, but when we learned this, I didn't know holding all the jobs at one time or another would be impossible. I accepted it as fact.]
"The guard over Jaylene's body says he was alone when questioned." [This does not compute. Which guard, when, and who questioned.?]
Alda says she has read a large portion of the library and private journals. (Another time issue) --[again, I accepted this as fact and did not understand this activity would be impossible because nothing in the narrative suggested this.]
Alda recognizes the assassin when all others are unaware.-- [I think you are rferring to when Jaylene and her party was equipping themselves for the journey. All I recall is that everyone was falling asleep except Tazar. I may have forgotten the specific episode you are referring to--which is then my bad.
"She is gradually revealed as a sleeper agent."--[this is made quite clear when Jaylene begins to put the pieces, and I got this loud and clear.]
"She knows things she shouldn't...about monsters and their abilities." --[As I vaguely recall, alda doesn't come right out and say this or that about a monster or person. It is inferred by her actions and reactions. She just does the right thing, as if she has foreknowledge that Jaylene wonders about. I guess I am missing the subtleties, and when I miss those, I am not getting the story as intended.. I recall mentioning I often need to be hit over the head with things.. Frankly, I don't know if this is my failing, or yours. ]
"She can see into the hearts of others (and knows that Elston loves Jaylene)". --[I do get this, but I just thought it was just her keen observation rather than something supernatural.]
"She can use the Lance despite everyone thinking this is impossible."--[this was made quite apparent to me, by Jaylene's revelation of that fact."
"She can do a spell that Jaylene can't do...to put Charm back in her body."--[Again, I got this by Jaylene's surprised observation of this, again adding another brick to the fact that Alda is different."
She only fights with her spear and NEVER casts spells with it."--[Didn't really notice. this.]
Yeah, that's the great thing about mystery clues. Though the ones about how many posts and how much of the library could be given more background. As to the guard being alone ... I have no idea what to make of that.
In the second or third chapter, the guard who ran away from the resurrection was questioned. He said he was alone while on guard. He wasn't aware that Alda was there. He was the puppy who got killed instead of Jaylene during the assassination attempt.
Oh, and holding every job except fixing the roof means that Alda might have been both Voice or Hand at one time or other. Just so y'all know.
She can see into the hearts of others (and knows that Elston loves Jaylene) Note that Jaylene mentions that the Defiler used to look into the hearts of his followers and use that knowledge to destroy them.
As to the fighting with her spear and never casting spells, I think I may have to go back and edit so that Alda doesn't even cast a light spell on the spear she carries. Or I may make that the one spell she is capable of. Not sure. But that is the thing about misdirection. You have to notice what ISN'T happening as well as what IS happening. I never go into Alda's POV when they are fighting the mar, so no one realizes she is following the person in front of her. She never sees the footprints that lead the priests along the waterfall. That part is assumed because all the other priests can do it.
The first use of the shield wall was under the cover of the waterfall mist. No one knew that Alda was landlocked at that time because they all ran into position and braced.
I'll add to the library and her boast about working every job in the temple...Someone will need to scoff and say that isn't possible. Simple fix.
Yeah, that part puzzles me. Was 'puppy' under someone's Veil? Did he not even know that Alda was with him?
Was the dog-breeding The Defilier's history?
Has The Defiler been that deep that long in the enemy camp? Could the Order have survived with the Enemy as the Voice?
Oh, these reveals are going to hit the reader like John Dickson Carr's load of bricks through a skylight--or maybe like a flash-bang grenade.
The scoff can be Jaylene's mental reaction. It can even give half the secret -- "She's not old enough for that. NOBODY could be."
No, the way it was framed it had something to do with her newly-granted powers.
I'm not sure exactly what the problem is, but here is my opinion anyways.
Readers do not need to know all of this. Some readers may go, mmmmm, while others (like me) just reads and accepts.
So when all is revealed, the one group will go, I knew or at least suspected it!, while the other group will go, Wha?! WTF just happened here?! Whoa, that was sssoooo good. It all makes sense now, how did I miss all these cluwwss?
As long as it makes sense at the end, it isn't a problem and nothing needs to be fixed per say. If Amy changes everything for the latter group of readers, she risks loosing all the readers of the first group who don't like everything spelled out clearly.
Right out confusion is bad. Dribbling questions along the way is not. It's IMO brilliant writing.
As long as things add up in the end, all is good and well. So I have no problems with this so far to let readers figure it out at the same pace as Jay-bird. Amy can choose to let readers in with her secret too, but you can't have both.
When Amy is done with the book/or when the last piece of the mystery is revealled, only then (if she decides to keep her readers in the dark that is) will I go: This doesn't add up, this doesn't make sense. But in the middle of the mystery being untangled? I'd give Amy the benefit of the doubt.
When all is revealed, an off hand comment for example by Lewellyn could be: yeah, I was wondering how anyone could read so many books! instead of Amy going and trying to work it in with say the library scene and (1) risks making it too obvious and (2) trying to make something fit in a scene where it doesn't belong and messing things up even more.
This is my 2 cents at least. Not sure it's applicable or makes sense though.
Right out confusion is bad. Dribbling questions along the way is not. It's IMO brilliant writing.
My opinion, too, as a long-time reader of mysteries, including Asimov's SF mysteries.
The thing I'm facing is that Ernie's reaction isn't a surprise. It has happened once or twice before. There have been a few others that felt kind of betrayed by Acts. Almost as if I'd wasted their time by making them read a book and not resolving the necromancer issue by the end. I'm writing a first draft so things will have to be added as I realize their importance (like mentioning that it isn't possible for someone to have read the entire library), so I think that this is a doable solution to my quandry.
I'm not being vulnerable. I'm just trying to wrap my head around how to finish this story in a way that satisfies. The visual I get is Lucas' ending of the 4th Star Wars segment, with everyone standing around at an awards ceremony and everyone laughing a a cute R2-D2. In other words, the main plot kept running in the background, but the first movie wrapped up with HFN (Happy for Now) satisfaction. (yes, Kenny, I learned that one from you)
I've always been good at telling a story, but finding the ending of a book is something that I've only managed once (with Acts). Ernie's reaction (which I consider valid) could be described as irritation. He has called it the never-ending story more than once.
While I know that I'm not going to satisfy every reader, this is still a valid critique. Largely because of Ernie, I've realized that I need to break Acts into two parts. The first will use the conflict with Alina as the driving action and end near or around the duel. The second book will pick up afterwards and deal with the necromancer presence as Anver figures out who is responsible and then explores the crypt after Alina's death. That way, I'll have a focused villain and a tighter plot line. I'll also have the ability to end each book with the HFN resolution.
I am thinking of adding more irritation on Jaylene's part as a way of helping the reader realize there are changes in store. Behira's mysteries are changing the way Jaylene thinks of her religion. Her Goddess has a few warts and these are becoming visible. There should be more outrage as Jaylene discovers these exceptions...kind of like writing Ernie's reaction into the character.
When I decided to make this the point where Jaylene gets a clue about Alda, it was me making the attempt to start a reveal without having everyone hit themselves (or me) in the head with a brick at the end. i'm still on the fence as to whether or not I've succeeded.
Kenny, I like the idea of having Lewellen mention trying the same feat as Alda and how he could never have that much time. That will be added.
Any thoughts?
You are saying that I need to keep Alina alive for the entire length of Anver's story?
Nonononononono.
Don't ruin the story to make it fit some other model!
My preference, which I hope you DON'T take (because you're doing this so well) would be to make it a single series of volumes with the threads cutting in and out in each. If you want to think about it, do it after they're all written.
The biggest argument for it is that certain actions in Acts change the magical landscape and force the action in the other threads.
We know that there are weak sections in Acts. It's a question of fixing them.
But by the time of the duel, we've already had the mystery of the containment jar. Bring that out as you should and Alina becomes the troublemaker who forced them into that mystery, and who also brought Anver and Kat together. Alina's job is done. Give her a big payoff (from the action side) and let the clues contintue to accumulate, while bringing the creepy Sil onto the stage.
Think of Alina as the JATO bottle.
Big issue about making Alina be the primary villain throughout the entire Anver thread is that they need the crypt open to find Faulter's hidden room, as well as Zyrtec's prank jar. If I made Alina a common thread for both books, she would have to be undead and aware, messing with Anver as he chased Maalok into the lower levels.
Did Maalok animate Alina and the two murdered students? Yes. But bring them back to a semblance of life and capable of using magic? Ooooo, dunno. Gotta think about that one.
My brain is all twisty now. Maalok is wearing a Horror. That much is revealed in the Shadowbook that Zyrtec left for Anver to find (in Acts). I've just revealed that Horrors are a piece of the Defiler (in Dictates). I've also stated that no one but the Defiler can raise someone from the dead (in Dictates).
Unlike Kenny, I like to follow my own rules. (had to get that jibe in, sorry K). So the question I need to answer is whether or not Maalok can raise the dead. I'm going to say that it is unlikely. Maalok's Horror is based on pride, while Charm is based on vanity (or lust-never commited to that decision). I don't think that Maalok would have the power required, even if he used the death energy of the murdered students.
Don't worry, New Jersey. I'll keep the pace going if Kenny's idea is worth my time. As to a book that intercuts all the threads as they happen, that is the way I used to write this story. I would do one chapter of each book at a time, syncing the stories. It just became a bloated monster, (Acts alone is more than 150K words). I haven't given the synchronous story idea up, but like you said, I have to finish the story first.
Looks like we just wrote past each other. Go back and see the JATO analogy.
WHY would Maalok or The Defiler raise Alina from the dead? It would give the secret away and Alina woldn't be valuable enough to justify that, not at this point in the story. As a creeper she's more valuable.
Up to this point I've been suspecting that Faulter is The Defiler, but then Faulter could raise Sosol to life. So now I'm thinking that Faulter wants The Defiler's power for that purpose.
Either way, is The Defiler aware of Zyrtec?
So, are the Horror's based on the Seven Deadly Sins?
I really loved Alina. She is a great baddy. For my $.02 worth, I think Alina is perfect all the way through. The duel that finishes her off is fantastic. BUT, and here's my take: Alina is in the forefront of the story, and all sorts of assumptions I made, weather my own or prompted by the story, set me to thinking Alina was part of the larger picture. But she was just an evil independent shit all on her own power trip. In the end, this was a bit disappointing to me, and Maalox (sorry can't help the puns) seemed to be too, convenient. It would be so easy to plug her and her school into the larger picture of the endless search ancient mages and the story. Alina got a lot more press than the Johnny-come-lately Maalox. Alina's character was juicy and something to get your teeth into. She dominated most of the story, so I was expecting something more than the sideline she got at the end.
I think Janet points out that we all are different readers and have our expectations of what we read. Everybody isn't gonna like it, so you have to write it for yourself first, and the audience will come to you. Sometime as a reviewer, I turn into a reader, and then let my own proclivities interfere. I know, as a writer, you want to know what works, but on the other hand you can ignore what you don't like. You've said this before, and I remember that, and keep it as a rule.
So it's back to reading for me. I can't let you get too far ahead.
Ernie
So you want a simple, Marvel Comics story? Actually, even the Marvel comics stories generaly have two cycles of danger-resolution (after the good guys finish fighting among themselves).
I think if the containment-jar portion gets its due, you'll see Alina as just one problem of many. Really, she's only in the foreground for a few chapters. I agree, she's a delightful villian, but she's far too small to be the big bad and you should see that she's just one landing in the staircase.
I'm surprised that the Zyrtec-hunt didn't put your interest in high gear again. It held my interest, big-time.
I think Janet points out that we all are different readers and have our expectations of what we read. Everybody isn't gonna like it, so you have to write it for yourself first, and the audience will come to you. Sometime as a reviewer, I turn into a reader, and then let my own proclivities interfere. I know, as a writer, you want to know what works, but on the other hand you can ignore what you don't like. You've said this before, and I remember that, and keep it as a rule.
So it's back to reading for me. I can't let you get too far ahead.
Ernie
Agree 100% with you Ernie! We are all different, an no one person is right and the rest wrong either. As long as you have readers who like it, it should be all good?
And anyone who says writing is easy needs a whack over the head, don't you think? There are so many ways to get to the end of a book, it's not even funny.
I should also get reading and reviewing too ...
I amplified Katerin's role considerably due to reader interest and this was a success. Before, she was the foil and just a snarky b***h. After, she grew to a better character by becoming the nice-gal-in-deep-trouble.
The rewrite will add to Alina. Of that I am sure. I don't write my villains very well in my first draft because I don't like them much. But the second pass this will change. And Maalox will have a much bigger asshole presence.
The real problem I have is that Alina knows things...owns things...hoards things. she knows too much. Not that I mind making things difficult for the good guys, but the whole first draft changes if she lives.
This is Kenny's revenge for me killing his plot, isn't it?
Actually, you did Alina very well overall. You don't want her taking over because if she does your 'not the real villain' pseudo-problem will get bigger.
Work on the containment jar. Maybe play up the Faulter discussion before the duel so that the reader knows that the torch is about to be passed.
Let Alina be a pons asinorem, and give the astute reader a Tabasco-cream-pie-in-the-face out-of-band clue.
Can Sil see that Anver is becoming a Founder?
Fantasy/Magic & Sci-Fi → Acts/ Dictates/ Mandates/ Mantle - Amy's Thread