Topic: Hello, I'm C.T. Keyes, returning member

You may have noticed a story called Werewarrior on the front page. It used to have a different title but much has changed since the last time I used this site. I had to leave for a while, but I missed this place so I decided to come back and share all the changes I've made and am still making to Werewarrior. I'm still hoping I can pull the book through the storm of amateur effort it still is and whip it into real finished product shape but it's still going to take a long time. I'm just going to enjoy the ride in the meantime.

Discuss anything you'd like with me on this thread.

2 (edited by njc 2015-08-12 05:42:53)

Re: Hello, I'm C.T. Keyes, returning member

I wanted to follow up on a few things from the reviews.

On topic flow:  If you were writing an essay or an article, you'd arrange your topics to help your reader understand what you meant to say.  Here you're writing a story, a narrative.  Narratives are largely sequential, and that means that your topics must follow that sequence.  But there are some exceptions.  You have some flexibility in where you present setting and backstory, and when topics follow one another you control how you flow from one to the next, and to what degree they are entwined.

On passives: I like to use "On ((date)), I was born," as a statement that must be in the passive.  There are active forms that work (usually using 'gave birth') but I think you see the point.

In general, and with some exception, you want the words of your topic to take the place or prominence in a sentence, and the sentences most central to your topic to take the place of prominence in your paragraphs.  In general, and with some exception, the place of prominence in a sentence is the subject, and the place of prominence in a paragraph is the first sentence.

When your topic noun/pronoun would otherwise be the direct object, it may be better to use the passive voice.  But usually not in the heat of action; there you want to stay with the active voice as much as you can--and again there are exceptions.

Copulas generally express static relationships.  "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.  It was ... ."  In this famous opening, Dickens sets the scene, in effect freezing the action long enough for us to step into the stage he has just set.  His string of contrasts has become a landmark in the world of narrative.

And yet even static things are often better expressed in active terms: The deep blue sky arched overhead, as far as the eye could see.  Even here, trying too hard can turn to self-parody.

Two of my favorite maxims come from Will Strunk and Winston Churchill.

Churchill first, since his is shorter: "Short words are best, and the old words, when short, are best of all."  (Most popular histories forget that Churchill was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature.)

The second is Will Strunk's Rule 13.  You should seek and buy a copy of the 1970's/1980's edition of Strunk and White.  But here is the one rule to never forget:

Rule 13: Omit needless words.
Vigorous writing is concise.  A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragaph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts.  This requires not that the writer make all his sentences short, or that he avoid all detail and treat his subjects only in outine, but that every word tell.

Look carefully and you will see that this paragraph illustrates itself by example, from its vigorous and concise opening to the last three words that ring like a peal.  Strunk did not achieve this perfection in one step.  There were at least two published revisions, each omitting another word or two found not to be wholly needful.

3 (edited by njc 2015-08-12 05:36:43)

Re: Hello, I'm C.T. Keyes, returning member

On repeated words: In one of Shakespeare's histories, I remember not which, the King of England receives a barrel of tennis balls from the King of France, with a note: For the Court of King ((Name)).  The King of England takes no little umbrage at this, declaring "I'll turn his balls to gunstones!" and continuing something like this: "By this mock he shall mock husbands from their wives, he shall mock sons from their mothers ..."  The word 'mock' is repeated over and over, a half-dozen times at least (and I think more).  Note that the word 'mock' appoximates the sound of a tennis ball struck by the racket.

Repetition and parallelism are tools, to be used well or ill.

The most common words are function words: the articles 'a'/'an' and 'the', the word 'to' used to introduce an infinitive as well as as a preposition, words like 'as' (which I just used twice in a row) and other words that have assigned functions in our grammar.  It would be pointless to say 'Do not repeat these'; it would be easier to write a novel without the letter 'e' (and that has been done; see Gadsby).

Other nouns and verbs are very specific to their meanings.  You do not call John 'Helen' just for variety.  You do not say the driver of a bus is litigating his bus down the road for the sake of variety.  The word, whether proper noun or verb, is proper to its specific meaning, and can only be replaced by strained constructions

Between these extremes, the function words and the words proper to their referent, there are many words which could be replaced by synonyms, or by near-synonyms whose different shading refines the original meaning, or provides a contrast, perhaps humorous.  If the change of words does not actually achieve that, then why ask the reader to adjust to the change?  Ideally, your story will so occupy the reader that the extra work will weaken the story, or at least the narrative.

To the degree that variety is necessary or desirable, there are other sources of it.  The alternation of pronoun and antecedent is one such; varying the length of sentences is another

And sometimes repetition drives a point home, as in 'By this mock', above.  Or in my example:

Merran ran too, ran up the hill faster than she'd ever run, ran without knowing that she ran, or that she was out of breath, or that the ground was trying to slip away under her pounding feet.

I intend that the reader, for a moment, will be as fully occupied by running as my protagonist is.  Maybe I suceed, maybe I fail.  But I chose the tool meaning it for this use; it was not accident.

Re: Hello, I'm C.T. Keyes, returning member

C.T.

Feel free to come over to the Medieval Fantasy and Magic thread. We don't bite and we have a wide assortment of folks who will discuss and go over your questions. I've found my learning curve has drastically increased because of these people.  We have scifi writers as well as romance on this site, as well as NJC. As you can see, the boy loves to talk...(coughs)...I mean teach. 

Hope to see you there.

A

Re: Hello, I'm C.T. Keyes, returning member

Maybe that's why I like Kha so much ... or maybe I'm just jealous about Sil.

Re: Hello, I'm C.T. Keyes, returning member

Thanks Amy, I'd be glad to join. Sounds like a jolly ole time.

Re: Hello, I'm C.T. Keyes, returning member

Thanks for the information njc, I'll do what I can to incorporate it.