Topic: Linear vs. Non-linear narrative

Before I start working on a rewrite of my book, there is an issue that keeps coming to mind.

The original version of my book begins in the past and time jumps to the future, following the main character from when he is a little farm boy, to his role as a warrior in present day Los Angeles.

My issue is that I wonder if it would be better to simply start in Modern day Los Angeles and reveal the past in flash backs, or even just slip it to the reader through a little exposition. Although there was a fight scene set a few years after the first few chapters that plays well into the latter part of the story.

There was a little rhyme and reason to doing it this way. I did want to challenge myself to progress a character in this way, child to adult. I actually think both versions would work but would like some outside input if anyone has any thoughts.

Quote Post 1

Re: Linear vs. Non-linear narrative

I think you've got enough material for the first scenes in the past.  It's long enough to be awkward as a flashback.  Unless there is strong reason to begin the telling in the present, after then past episodes, I'd start with the older part of the story.

Quote Post 2

Re: Linear vs. Non-linear narrative

I read two of your three opening chapters. I agree with NJC. Unless you plan to trim a lot of that, it's too much material for flashbacks. It'll just cause confusion. Go with a linear progression.

Quote Post 3

Re: Linear vs. Non-linear narrative

Yeah, that's what I was thinking. Plus, I've got a killer idea for a new start to chapter 1. I might post a few more chapters of the book as is, but I want to start focusing on my rewrites soon.

Quote Post 4