Thanks, Corra!

Hi folks,
Anyone know how to contact (e-mail) Tirzah Laughs? She did an amazing job helping me set up a website and blog a few years ago, but I've let it lapse. Would like to start it up again. If you know how to reach her or have any other contacts who are good with setting up writers' websites for a reasonable fee, please respond to this thread or send me a message/quickie.
Thanks!
Gray

53

(14 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Congratulations! Very exciting news. Wishing you epic success, Simon!

54

(43 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Hi folks. I'm not crazy about the idea that you must respond to a review before being able to post again. If I write a review and get no response or recip, I assume the writer doesn't want to start a TNBW "relationship" with me and move on. The site certainly has enough talented and generous writers to make up for the rare snub. Not responding may not be great etiquette, but that's certainly within a member's right. No point in trying to force courtesy out of people.

55

(10 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I think sentence 2 is correct.

56

(2 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Cool, Janet! Best of luck with your new venture/adventure. Seeing your writing/editing/marketing skills in action with your own work, I have no doubt you'll enjoy much success sharing these talents with other writers. Gray:)

Voted yesterday. Great cover. Good luck!

58

(107 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Got a headache just trying to plot this one out in my head, so kudos to the brave and creative souls who entered. On a positive note, there's been some exceptional world-building and creativity in the small group of entries, especially when it comes to the identity of the required "deaf, mute, or blind" main character.

59

(9 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Many writers have active blogs. Would there be a way to link these blogs to TNBW and have the conversations "cloned" here and on the individual blog sites? That might generate both engaging conversations and more site traffic via "cross-pollination." Not even sure if this is logistically possible, but just brainstorming!

That's amazing feedback. Well done. I need to order a copy.

61

(1 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thanks to incredibly helpful critiques by readers such as Don Chambers and GPyrenees, I'm removing my 3rd person POV chapters and replacing them with my MC's POV, starting with Chapter 5 (Aftermath), which I just reposted. I've left the old version up and would love any feedback on whether I should go with the new version or stick with the old. Thanks! Gray

62

(12 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I think Vern's point is right on target. To me, "tell" is a dry narration of events as they happen. Medical writing is the classic dry "tell":

"The patient presented with a history of blunt force trauma to the abdomen. An exploratory laparoscopy was performed, revealing 20 ccs of bright red blood in the peritoneal cavity..."

It's as if the purpose of this writing style is to strip away all drama from even the most dramatic scenario. So if you're describing a battle, show the events in graphic, action-packed detail. If you merely summarize what happened, you're introducing the kind of clinical detachment that makes a scene less tense and exciting.

In your specific example, I think sentences like "The marines were hopelessly outnumbered" and modifiers like "In response" are dry "tell" -- the kind of narration you'd find in a war documentary. On the other hand, when you describe the colonel charging at the enemy and firing his crisper (cool name for a weapon, BTW), even after an arm has been blown off, that's riveting stuff -- definitely "show." I'd also go easy with the adjectives and adverbs. Others may disagree, but I find that prose choked with modifiers reads more like "tell" in that it tends to ramble on rather than cut straight to the action/point. Your example, for instance, is cluttered with extraneous modifiers (highlighted in caps below) that kill your pace:

"walked [PURPOSEFULLY]"... "[HEAVIEST] stream"... "moved RELENTLESSLY forward" (why not just "charged/barreled/pressed/drove forward"?)... "[HEAVILY] muscled man"... "[CONTINUED] firing his crisper" (why not just "fired his crisper"? or "kept firing his crisper?"), etc...

In sum, ditch the extraneous adverbs/adjectives and passive sentences (e.g. "Soon, weapons fire targeted the Marines from three sides..."; "causing the enemy to fall back in fear") and your battle scene will be much more gripping.  --Gray

63

(5 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

I voted for the bloody heart. Terrific cover. Good luck, Janet!

64

(8 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

That's awesome! Congrats, Ann!

Congrats! That's terrific news. Hopefully, that's just a start for good news coming your way in 2017!

66

(60 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Happy New Year, guys! Voted for TNBW, REAPER. And WILTED MAG. Good luck with the contest. Gray:)

Entered my vote, Janet. Good luck!

68

(1 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Thanks, NJC, for giving me some very helpful feedback about where/how to end book one. My first thought was to end with Astrid's POV in the last two chapters, since she's going to narrate a good part of book 2. There's a natural "break" in the story when she's separated from Wil and her friends, and this seemed like a logical place to start her thread. I'll have to revisit this after I've finished my main editing project: to remove all 3rd person POV chapters (told from the villain's perspective) and replace these with Wil's POV. That's what I'm working on now.

Congrats! Loved the humor, tongue-in-cheek "50 Shades" vibe, and that perfect twist at the end. The master wants his Nutella!!!

70

(5 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Terrific review, Janet, and well deserved! Way to go!

71

(9 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Congrats, John! Terrific read, and more topical than ever.

All gacks aside (and I'm not sure if Gack! is even a bad thing; guess that would depend on context), that's an excellent revision, Ron. You lead by introducing the MCs, then spell out the conflict, ending with a nice hook about the what's at stake for "the great city of Anderholm" and the choice Shadyia will face.  If I ever get to the query stage, I'll definitely hit you up for advice! Gray

73

(6 replies, posted in TheNextBigWriter Premium)

Congratulations, Jack! Given how topical REAPER is, I'm glad you're getting it out there ASAP.

Rhiannon: to illustrate your point about first person POV and sci-fi, I'm citing below the first few lines of "Dark Eden" by Chris Beckett. The author didn't open with a long preamble about an alien, sunless planet or the inbred human tribes subsisting on this hostile, geothermally powered world. Rather, the backstory fills in around the main characters as they start an ordinary day, getting ready to hunt:

"    THUD, THUD, THUD. Old Roger was banging a stick on our group log to get us up and out of our shelters.
     "Wake up, you lazy newhairs. If you don't hurry up, the dip will be over before we even get there, and all the bucks will have gone back up dark"
     Hmmph, hmmph, hmmph, went the trees all around us, pumping and pumping hot sap from underground. Hmmmmmmm, went forest. And from over Peckhamway came the sound of axes from Batwing group. They were starting their wakings a couple of hours ahead of us, and they were already busy cutting down a tree.... "

Less than 200 words in and I already know I'm in a completely alien world, filled with strange sights and sounds. The author doesn't info dump about how this colony was founded by a handful of humans -- hence the inbreeding of "Batwing" group, which we come to learn is so named because their cleft lips give them "bat-like" faces. Nor does he explain that - in a world with no sun - waking and sleeping cycles would be governed by some other system of "wakings." Rather, we're plunged right into this unique and brilliantly creative universe.

One more suggestion: I agree with Don that you should restrict your POVs to the main characters only. Otherwise, this kind of narrative can get too crowded and quite jarring.