1,001

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

I can buy an alternate timeline path (and bear in mind, my main series is also an alternate timeline that branched in the 1200BCE range but sort of mirrors ours until the discovery of steam)...

As a reader, if I'm in an alternate timeline, I'd like enough hints to get it early so I don't read in the wrong reference frame. I wouldn't want to be reading in my reality that Goldilocks ate the porridge only to discover at the 75% mark that the three bears altered her initial entrance to the cabin.

That is to say, I love remakes of the classic storylines... as long as I'm in on the game. How well the hints play out (that it's a remake) take a major role in whether I've followed well or been cheated

1,002

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

From what I've read, I believe Michael is more powerful, although it's always possible that Michael never faced him one-on-one. There's a mosaic at St. Peter's Basilica of a victorious Michael standing with a raised sword and his foot on the head of Satan. But that's imagery and not necessarily based on anything biblical.

Assume the chain is made by God since it has supernatural powers (otherwise, how would you chain a spiritual being?). But then, so what? The wager involves Connor choosing whom to kill using the dagger from book one. Does it matter if Lucifer is stronger than Michael or not? Strength isn't gonna decide that contest

So, not sure where this falls, but I read the scripture as saying "Lucifer went to war against Heaven and only God could stop him. But God loved everyone and couldn't kill Lucifer outright, so he cast him down to Earth"

Now... if there were other beings who could stop Lucifer but were not creator entities and thus not beholden with creation-love, one would think they would just do it.

It follows from scripture that Lucifer's wings stretched over the throne of God. He shielded the rest of creation from God's glory with his own presence. Michael did none of these things... thus, one might one infer that Michael could not stop Lucifer from sinning (had he wanted to, of course). Could Michael have prevented the original war? Implicitly God could not because he valued free will, but Michael is not so beholden.

Herein lies the problem. If Michael is more powerful, and he could have stopped the great war... and he was not beholden by being the creator (eg creator of Lucifer and able to be compassionate to ultimate evil)... then by rights he should have used his power to prevent ultimate evil from taking lives. Even should the Creator have ordered him not to, Michael would be justified to disobey and follow his calling. Same as Lucifer could follow his calling and plunge the world into darkness, so too should Michael be able to plunge the world into light. Free will shouldn't only apply to bad guys, right?

No middle ground available where these two simply call off their bets. If (ultimate evil) can break the rules to chase (x) then (ultimate good) can also break the rules to chase (y)

Ergo, the stronger of these two would have decided the fate of the universe.

Since Lucifer exists, therefore we must assume Michael was not strong enough to stop him. OR Michael could have stopped him i(n disobedience of God (sacrificing himself in order to upheld righteousness)). If Michael was strong enough but opted not to, he has permitted evil to exist to save his own skin (from the punishment of disobedience).

1,003

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

From Catholic.com:

Whatever their status was in their immediate creation, and some would argue that Satan/Lucifer/the devil was of a higher and thus more powerful choir than the Michael the Archangel, who was one of the lower choirs, all that theological speculation is moot, because St. Michael was and is faithful to Almighty God and thus was able to defeat the devil (Rev. 12:7-9). And in the same Lord God he maintains power over Satan for all those who faithfully seek his angelic intercession.

Of the fallen angels, Scripture refers to Satan as their leader, as in “the devil and his angels” (Matthew 25:41). Because of his demonic leadership, many theologians have reasonably argued that the devil is an angelic seraphim or a cherubim, though others have disagreed.

In any event, again, the devil’s pre-fallen status is a moot point. St. Michael is undoubtedly more powerful than the devil is, given his fidelity to God, and as was first illustrated in his role in vanquishing the devil and his demonic confreres from the heavenly realm.

1,004

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

From Wikipedia (article about Michael):

Michael is mentioned explicitly in Revelation 12:7-12, where he does battle with Satan and casts him out of heaven so that he no longer has access to God as accuser (his formal role in the Old Testament). The fall of Satan at the coming of Jesus marks the separation of the New Testament from Judaism.

1,005

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

Kdot wrote:

As a reader, if I'm in an alternate timeline, I'd like enough hints to get it early so I don't read in the wrong reference frame. I wouldn't want to be reading in my reality that Goldilocks ate the porridge only to discover at the 75% mark that the three bears altered her initial entrance to the cabin.

I'll probably have an early chapter in the book where the 8th century manuscript is found, and I can include snippets of its contents in the scene. It has to be discussed before Connor's meeting with the Council of Cardinals (chapter 15) because there's no room in that chapter to cover everything. I may set the time period for the chapter in the past (hundreds of years ago?), and have a meeting at the Vatican to discuss its interpretation of Revelation, the idea that Christ will return as a boy, and the fact that the Bible is for another timeline. Those ideas are considered too wild to be taken seriously at the time, but since the manuscript was written by a saint (handwriting and ink/paper analysis all check out), it is not declared a heresy. They simply decide to put it in the archives. Song will claim to have stumbled upon it at some earlier point in his Vatican career, when he could still see/read such handwritten documents. He'll then raise it at the council meeting after he sees Connor/Christ. A key to it becoming believed will be a series of prophesied events written by Satan for our time, which he then ensures actually happen when predicted.

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

Dirk B. wrote:

Kdot, don't forget the Christian cross around De Rosa's neck. As he admitted to Romano at the end of book 1, Michael the Archangel slipped it around De Rosa's neck while he was distracted. It's essentially a chain around De Rosa that limits his powers, causes his excruciating stigmata when he kills clergy, and prevents Satan from leaving De Rosa's body. Thus, no whisking. I based my story's "chain" on the one used to chain up the dragon in Revelation.

I have to admit you approach on the chain is interesting. Rev 20:1-6 is quite different from what you're doing BUT I like how you borrow from it. Very creative.

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

Dirk B. wrote:

From Wikipedia (article about Michael):

Michael is mentioned explicitly in Revelation 12:7-12, where he does battle with Satan and casts him out of heaven so that he no longer has access to God as accuser (his formal role in the Old Testament). The fall of Satan at the coming of Jesus marks the separation of the New Testament from Judaism.

I'm not a theologian but don't you mean his role in the OT and NT? I've heard Satan described as the accuser of the brethren.

1,008

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

George FLC wrote:
Dirk B. wrote:

From Wikipedia (article about Michael):

Michael is mentioned explicitly in Revelation 12:7-12, where he does battle with Satan and casts him out of heaven so that he no longer has access to God as accuser (his formal role in the Old Testament). The fall of Satan at the coming of Jesus marks the separation of the New Testament from Judaism.

I'm not a theologian but don't you mean his role in the OT and NT? I've heard Satan described as the accuser of the brethren.

The above was a quote from Wikipedia. I didn't write it. I know he's referred to as the accuser, although I don't know if he still has that role in the NT. I wasn't there. :-)

1,009 (edited by Dirk B. 2024-02-22 18:01:20)

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

George FLC wrote:
Dirk B. wrote:

Kdot, don't forget the Christian cross around De Rosa's neck. As he admitted to Romano at the end of book 1, Michael the Archangel slipped it around De Rosa's neck while he was distracted. It's essentially a chain around De Rosa that limits his powers, causes his excruciating stigmata when he kills clergy, and prevents Satan from leaving De Rosa's body. Thus, no whisking. I based my story's "chain" on the one used to chain up the dragon in Revelation.

I have to admit you approach on the chain is interesting. Rev 20:1-6 is quite different from what you're doing BUT I like how you borrow from it. Very creative.

The wording in Rev 20 is allegory. After all, you've got a  so-called abyss and a dragon. Therefore, my interpretation seems reasonable. The Catholic Church believes we are already in the thousand year period (one thousand is sometimes used to represent "a large number" in the Bible; that period represents the reign of Christ from the altar via the Eucharist (i.e., He's here now)). Since the dragon is chained and thrown into the abyss, either he is completely unable to cause great evil during that period, or the chain merely limits Satan's power but doesn't prevent him from still causing evil acts. Since we're in the thousand year period and there is still great evil in the world, clearly Satan is not completely impotent. My chain only limits his power; it doesn't make him impotent. I also use the chain for other useful story purposes: the stigmata and the chain (supposedly given to him by John Paul II!) both make him a less likely suspect; he's also unable to change bodies, otherwise he'd be almost impossible to identify. If he can't change bodies and he's in the story, then he's got to be one of the existing characters. I do have characters speculate that the Unholy Trinity is in the story, which includes Satan. His inability to change bodies plays an important role in books two and three.

1,010 (edited by Dirk B. 2024-02-23 16:44:20)

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

George FLC wrote:

I'm trying to remember how much de Rosa did. Should he jump in a little more with a slip here and there that causes people to wonder? Maybe have him and Connor lock eyes at some point and Connor turns nastily away. De Rosa always goes with the flow. Maybe he should swim against the flow. Or at least go in a different direction than Campagna sometime.

I might be stating things that you've already done but I have a great excuse in that I was on brain fog meds for a while :-)

I forgot to answer this. De Rosa was a weak character in the first draft. He and Campagna were completely interchangeable with respect to the hunt for the AC. Only her alcoholism and hunt for her son distinguished her from De Rosa. In the next draft, where I replace the NOCS (Italian SWAT) team with a two-hundred-year-old demon-hunting team, De Rosa will be the devil-may-care (pun intended) modern-day leader of the team. She'll be promoted to chief inspector (from senior inspector) and become his boss, causing (I hope) plenty of friction between them. As a result, they can't be on friendly terms prior to the investigation beginning, unlike now, where's he's the Vatican's liaison officer and she's worked with him many times.

Why would Connor turn nastily away from De Rosa? De Rosa is his godfather and, by all appearances, they're very close, although Connor gets pissed off at the end once De Rosa admits that the wager with God is the real reason Connor exists.

I also have to be careful not to give any hints about either Connor or De Rosa. Two of my story's four Christian readers to date guessed that Connor is/may be the Antichrist. There's a huge hurdle to jump when it comes to Christian readers since most serious Christians are highly sceptical right from the get go that Connor could be Christ returned as a boy because, to them, it can't happen. As a result, they may never even read the book.

1,011 (edited by George FLC 2024-02-23 16:49:50)

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

Dirk B. wrote:

I also have to be careful not to give any hints about either Connor or De Rosa. Two of my story's four Christian readers to date guessed that Connor is/may be the Antichrist. There's a huge hurdle to jump when it comes to Christian readers since most serious Christians are highly sceptical right from the get go that Connor could be Christ returned as a boy because, to them, it can't happen. As a result, they may never even read the book.

You had me fooled! I assumed too much. Connor's lie bothered me, but I guess I let it ride perhaps hoping to change your mind.
I'll be tougher next time round!
:-)

1,012

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

The lie is going to go away too.

1,013 (edited by Dirk B. 2024-02-23 17:51:01)

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

I was trying to figure out how to explain away any inconsistencies between Bible verses that discuss Christ's return and the idea that Christ will return as a boy. Since that could be a very long discussion, I'll nip it in bud by relying on the fact that our modern Bible is actually from the old timeline. Because of the wager, our new timeline no longer has to match the Bible, although I still want to minimize the number of unexplained discrepancies. If you read the previous post, you'll remember that, although the Bible doesn't match our timeline, the Bible itself is inerrant for its timelime. That is the part the cardinals will discuss when they meet with Connor, which is a much shorter conversation. As noted in one of my previous posts, an earlier chapter will provide all the setup for that topic.

EDIT: The same solution will allow me to use a more comprehensive battle between Connor and De Rosa. They'll both begin with human armies, then the demons attack on De Rosa's behalf, and all seems lost. That's when St. Michael leads a charge of angels against the demons. Modern weapons won't work around Megiddo because it's the site of Christ's imminent return, so only tech that existed during Christ's time will work (kinda lame, but I can't have tanks and other modern hardware, not even grenade launchers or guns, since all that's too violent). And like the timeline changes, I'm going to rely on the 8th century manuscript to explain why my story even has a real battle, which otherwise wouldn't be Catholic. Although, technically, my battle is between Satan's forces and those of the Antichrist. As a result, this is not the battle in Revelation, which won't happen.

1,014

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

I also have to be careful not to give any hints about either Connor or De Rosa.

I've been turning this around in my head for months with no solution yet. Problem is De Rosa stayed on my list because he had a measurable power. IF you remove that, you can end up with a case where the reader complains there weren't enough clues and De Rosa was out of left field.

The unanswerable question is "Do I have enough clues based on him being conveniently out of breath at one episode had he not been on my suspect-list?"

Answer probably not. (Heck, on the other site I read a rape scene and had no idea lol.)

How to remove the powers yet still leave a trail? More clues from the "Dark figure" episodes perhaps? One of the cardinals figures out the dark figure is left-handed. Oddly, so is De Rosa. But the Cardinal doesn't live to report his finding. Someone stabs dark figure. De Rosa later explaining he cut his hand on glass? Too obvious?

1,015 (edited by Dirk B. 2024-02-23 21:51:13)

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

Now that you mention it, I do give clues about De Rosa.
- when they're reviewing the security footage from the first church, they see the dark figure next to his Mercedes. Based on the car's known height, he estimates: 185 cm, same as me. smile
- De Rosa suffers stigmata every time a cardinal is killed. Now, stigmata is a rather confusing clue, but it is there. And he suffers stigmata supposedly from watching The Passion of the Christ the night before they find the last cardinal dead. It's such a weird detail that regular mystery readers ought to be wondering about it.
- De Rosa and the dark one both have a medium build
- De Rosa has blue eyes and blond hair, same as Campagna's rapist. So, if you guess he's the rapist, and you tie that to the fact that Campagna's missing son is probably Connor AND is De Rosa's godson, then it's not too big a stretch to think maybe he's in it up to his eyeballs.
- there is speculation that the Unholy Trinity is in the story, which requires three characters, and there's quite a limit on potential recurring characters in the story.
- I know I have other clues too

I remember thinking it was okay, even preferable, for the reader to guess that De Rosa is the dark figure/Antichrist since, then, they'll never see the real twist (Connor is the AC) coming. Marilyn was sure Connor was the Antichrist, but then I revealed de Rosa as the dark figure first, and she was very surprised, thinking the dark figure was the Antichrist. Then I reveal Connor is the AC.

In the second draft, I'll have Connor beat up by Alessandro as one of the first scenes, and the latter subsequently suffers a seizure and is healed by Connor. Again, barely a clue, but it's all noticeable on a second read. I think it would be too obvious if Alessandro has the seizure right while pummeling Connor, but maybe...

1,016 (edited by Dirk B. 2024-02-26 18:12:08)

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

I've been thinking through the idea of alternate timelines some more to explain why the story's timeline doesn't match the Bible, which is of course from our real-world timeline. I think I need to find a better way to get our Bible into the story's timeline than to simply state that it "somehow" happened, perhaps because there is only one, inerrant God-inspired Bible across all timelines/realities, even though no other timeline except ours matches that Bible. It would be an interesting thing to discuss and try to explain that in the book, but I have no need or space for it.

The new, story timeline arose because of the wager (i.e., the story's timeline, where there is a Connor/wager, split off from the original timeline, where there was neither). A key question is, why does the new timeline not have its own version of the Bible, written prior to the wager being made? There ought to be biblical prophecies in the new timeline about Connor that pre-date the moment the wager was agreed to, which took us from the old, real timeline to the new, story timeline. Instead, the new timeline somehow simply ends up with the old timeline's Bible.

The best idea I can think of is to state that, before the wager, there was only one timeline, and once the wager was agreed to, the new timeline branched off from our old one, and both timelines (old and new) share identical history prior to the timelines splitting. As a result, the Bible, which was written for the original timeline (prior to the wager) is identical to the Bible in the new timeline since both timelines used to be one. I think that's a relatively straightforward explanation to wrap one's head around.

This issue only comes up because I want to leave the Bible inerrant while still explaining why the story timeline differs from it. Prior to the wager, the story timeline didn't even exist, so the prophecies could not have included information from it. Granted, God could have provided that information to the Bible's authors, but God had his reasons for allowing the prophecies to be written down in a way that only matched the old timeline, in which the Bible was written. It was left to Satan to take that into consideration, which he overlooked.

Instead, Satan read Revelation after it was first written and issued his challenge based on it, which split the new timeline off from the old one, with a Bible originally intended for the latter. The old timeline still exists, so there are today two timelines, and the prophecies are for the old one only. Now, is it fair for God not to tell Satan what will happen to him if he issues the challenge? I would say yes since, initially, the old timeline was all there was. Satan had yet to issue the challenge, creating the new timeline. He has free will, so he could have gone a third route that spared him from the Lake of Fire, but he saw the wager and the resulting new timeline as a way to defeat God and gain control over the Earth for all time.

As readers of Connor's story, we used to live in the old timeline, but we became part of the new timeline when it split from the former. There is now a Connor in our universe, and events will occur because of him that do not match our Bible, which is identical across both timelines.

Make sense?

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

Dirk B. wrote:

I've been thinking through the idea of alternate timelines some more to explain why the story's timeline doesn't match the Bible, which is of course from our real-world timeline. I think I need to find a better way to get our Bible into the story's timeline than to simply state that it "somehow" happened, perhaps because there is only one, inerrant God-inspired Bible across all timelines/realities, even though no other timeline except ours matches that Bible. It would be an interesting thing to discuss and try to explain that in the book, but I have no need or space for it.

Before I dig into the rest of your post, I must ask - Are you referring to a timeline defined by Revelations or the entire Bible or what? I ask because I understand that Revelations can be figurative. Does that include the timeline? In other words, is Revelations just a series of descriptions not set in a rigid order? Of course, the end stuff is obviously in order! Just a thought!

1,018 (edited by Dirk B. 2024-02-26 17:19:39)

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

My references to timelines here has nothing to do with the content of Revelation,  although the latter is obviously the biggest discrepancy between the two timelines. To be clear a timeline is everything that happens in the universe along one time-ordered sequence of events, such as a universe with Connor and one without him. Naturally, my story is only concerned with Earth, but a timeline generally spans the cosmos and all past and future events in that "version" of the cosmos.

By the way, I googled Revelation vs Revelations since you spell it with an s. Wikipedia claims it's the Book of Revelation, sometimes erroneously referred to as the Book of Revelations.

1,019

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

I happened to notice that this thread has been viewed over 145,000 times. I was a bit freaked by the number until I looked at the whole forum. My old Galaxy Tales thread has been viewed 280K times. Sorcerer's Progress, 360K. And Amy still holds the record at 465K for her Acts+ thread! Yay, Amy.

1,020

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

Most of that activity is likely webcrawlers. Especially so if Amy's thread consistently grows its view-count

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

Timelines - This is complex, but I will try. I need to describe two Greek words - logos and rhema. Both logos and rhema are the Word of God, but the former is God's Word objectively recorded in the Bible, while the latter is the word of God spoken to us at a specific occasion (I copied this last sentence). If someone is part of the Charismatic Renewal, Pentacostal Movement, and others, then they can have prophecies (rhema). This can be God speaking through a person perhaps a prophet. This 'word from God' cannot contradict the logos or written word. Therefore, try having prophets show up or priests (bishops, cardinals, etc.) that give prophetic words that 'clarify' what the Bible says about a particular scripture. If Revelation can be figurative then these so-called prophets can tell people exactly what those figurative things mean. By the way, dreams, visions, and other things can also be claimed to be rhema words.

It will really help your cause if these 'prophets' show great spiritual power. You've done stuff like that with Conner already. If someone comes along and starts doing miracles, then I will almost guarantee that they will believe almost anything coming out of that person's mouth. You can craft great lies but have the crowds say - Did you see what he just did? Of course, this God speaking to us. And it makes more sense than the Bible does! And if the Catholic Church approves these prophets or prophetesses then so much the better.

This allows you to keep the original Biblical timeline but to distort it for those who see great power.

I hope this makes sense.

1,022 (edited by Dirk B. 2024-02-29 22:38:11)

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

If someone is part of the Charismatic Renewal, Pentacostal Movement, and others, then they can have prophecies (rhema).

It's an interesting concept, but the target for book one is the Catholic Church, the members of which are my target audience for book one. The Unholy Trinity won't go after other denominations until book two onward. Also, the dual timelines explain the discrepancies between an inerrant Bible and the story's timeline. Also, if someone comes along doing miracles and spouts explanations that appear to contradict the Bible, then that individual is an obvious antichrist, predicted by Christ in the New Testament, which shouldn't be believed. I don't think the Catholic Church would ever approve his words if they contradict the Bible without extraordinary proof such as provided by events in Rome, the Vatican, and the Holy Land related to the conspiracy surrounding Connor.

Also, I can't think of a realistic explanation in the new timeline that would allow prophets to interpret Revelation such that Christ will return as a boy, at the center of the conspiracy that will kill either Christ or Satan.

1,023 (edited by George FLC 2024-02-29 23:49:57)

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

Dirk B. wrote:

If someone is part of the Charismatic Renewal, Pentacostal Movement, and others, then they can have prophecies (rhema).

It's an interesting concept, but the target for book one is the Catholic Church, the members of which are my target audience for book one. The Unholy Trinity won't go after other denominations until book two onward. Also, the dual timelines explain the discrepancies between an inerrant Bible and the story's timeline. Also, if someone comes along doing miracles and spouts explanations that appear to contradict the Bible, then that individual is an obvious antichrist, predicted by Christ in the New Testament, which shouldn't be believed. I don't think the Catholic Church would ever approve his words if they contradict the Bible without extraordinary proof such as provided by events in Rome, the Vatican, and the Holy Land related to the conspiracy surrounding Connor.

Also, I can't think of a realistic explanation in the new timeline that would allow prophets to interpret Revelation such that Christ will return as a boy, at the center of the conspiracy that will kill either Christ or Satan.

1. There is a Catholic Charismatic Renewal going on. I belong to one of their groups even though I'm a protestant.
2. Correct. It would be tricky to blatantly contradict the Bible. Cardinals in strategic locations are needed to twist, distort, etc.
3. A weak example is when you had actual dragonflies attack Conner in Israel. I thought those REPRESENTED helicopters or something. I thought they would be big not bug like.
4. This is REALLY weak but Revelation 12 figurative talks about the birth of Jesus. You would have to construct it to point to Connor.

Revelation 12 And then a great wonder appeared in heaven: There was a woman who was clothed with the sun, and the moon was under her feet. She had a crown of twelve stars on her head (Spiritually speaking, Campagna was incredible). 2 She was pregnant and cried out with pain because she was about to give birth (Just like it happened to Campagna).

3 Then another wonder appeared in heaven: There was a giant red dragon there. The dragon had seven heads with a crown on each head. It also had ten horns. 4 Its tail swept a third of the stars out of the sky and threw them down to the earth (They were ready to wage war and kill Conner). It stood in front of the woman who was ready to give birth to the baby. It wanted to eat the woman’s baby as soon as it was born. (Satan wanted her to abort the baby! He was ready to kill it. But she said no!)

5 The woman gave birth to a son, who would rule all the nations with an iron rod (look at Connor's power! He should rule all nations). And her child was taken up to God and to his throne. 6 The woman ran away into the desert to a place that God had prepared for her (Campagna was in the police department for years separated from her son. It was like being in the desert for her). There she would be taken care of for 1260 days (this somehow has to be twisted but I'm not sure). (There are more verses but it complicates what I would like to see.)

There might be other verses in other chapters, but I can't think of them right now.

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

I added some edits to the above to show how to twist and bend it.

1,025 (edited by Dirk B. 2024-02-29 23:58:18)

Re: Satan's Last Stand (the Connor series) - Dirk B.

George FLC wrote:

If someone is part of the Charismatic Renewal, Pentacostal Movement, and others, then they can have prophecies (rhema).
1. There is a Catholic Charismatic Renewal going on. I belong to one of their groups even though I'm a protestant.
2. Correct. It would be tricky to blatantly contradict the Bible. Cardinals in strategic locations are needed to twist, distort, etc.
3. A weak example is when you had actual dragonflies attack Conner in Israel. I thought those REPRESENTED helicopters or something. I thought they would be big not bug like.
4. This is REALLY weak but Revelation 12 figurative talks about the birth of Jesus. You would have to construct it to point to Connor.

Revelation 12 And then a great wonder appeared in heaven: There was a woman who was clothed with the sun, and the moon was under her feet. She had a crown of twelve stars on her head. 2 She was pregnant and cried out with pain because she was about to give birth.
3 Then another wonder appeared in heaven: There was a giant red dragon there. The dragon had seven heads with a crown on each head. It also had ten horns.
4 Its tail swept a third of the stars out of the sky and threw them down to the earth. It stood in front of the woman who was ready to give birth to the baby. It wanted to eat the woman’s baby as soon as it was born.
5 The woman gave birth to a son, who would rule all the nations with an iron rod. And her child was taken up to God and to his throne. 6 The woman ran away into the desert to a place that God had prepared for her. There she would be taken care of for 1260 days. (There's more but it complicates what I would like to see.)

There might be other verses, but I can't think of them right now.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but a Catholic Charismatic movement is not the same as the majority of the Catholic Church, or is it? It's the mainstream Church that Connor/Satan are after first.
I think you mean locusts, not dragonflies. The locusts came straight out of Revelation, including their scorpion-like stingers.

I have no problem contradicting the Bible anymore since the alternate, story timeline perfectly explains why the Bible differs from actual events in the story timeline (both timelines inherited the same Bible). There will be a scene dedicated to puzzling out how it could be that the inerrant Bible differs from current events in the story timeline. The Bible was written before the timeline split in two (real-world vs story-world timelines). And God had his reason for allowing the Bible to be written the way it was, not least of which is the fact that the story timeline didn't exist at the time the Bible was written. That Bible correctly predicted what would happen if the timeline continued as is. That scared Satan (who has free will) into issuing his final challenge; when God accepted, the new, story timeline branched off, resulting in both timelines having the same history and the same Bible, yet the Bible only describes events in the old timeline. The theologians will eventually conclude that 1) their Bible is inerrant, but 2) it was written for a different timeline.