Topic: Suggestion to Improve Reviews Received

Greetings and Salutations to all my fellow wack-a-doodles who think, for whatever God-forsaken reason, that writing fiction is our dream of a lifetime...to each and all, Hello!

I had a thought (yes, it was painful but I think I'll survive) regarding the purpose of this website: getting our work peer reviewed and offering the priceless wisdom of our experiences in our own peer reviews of our colleagues' works. Maybe it's just me, meaning I suck at weaving a coherent story together, making it simply too painful for my authorly peers to wade through the quagmire of a chapter I've written. If that's the case, so be it and that's on me. But I've noticed in the 3 years I've been a posting and reviewing fool on site here that the number of reviews -- both in-line and regular -- dwindles considerably in number from the first chapters to the last ones in a book. For example, my current offering THE EMPEROR'S SON has garnered 12 in-line reviews for the Prologue and Ch. 1 since I first posted it in May of this year. Chapter 2 has only 6 in-line reviews and 1 regular. Chapter 3 has 6 inline, and Chapter 4 has 5 inline. The count steadily declines with the latest chapter 18 currently sporting only 1 inline.

So....I know this isn't the first post in this forum dealing with disappointing follow-through to the final chapter of a posted book. What I haven't seen is a viable solution to the problem. Because, let's face it: as awesome as reviews can be, one alone is usually not much help in the grand scheme of things.
(And yes, I know I have not always completed reviews to the end of a book I started reading but in my own defense, I think I do make a decent effort at it, sometimes putting in multiple chapter reviews at a time to 'catch up' when real life has intervened and thrown a monkey wrench into my best laid plans.)

Here's my suggestion, and I'm hoping Sol will weigh in on this. Is there a way to offer a bonus reward when a reader completes a review for all the chapters of a book posted to the site? I suggest offering 1 point per chapter, in a lump sum credited to the reader's account, when he/she (don't jump me for not listing a bazillion gender pronouns...I'm old and don't have that much time left to spend on trying to list all the currently popular 'name that pronoun' favorites) submits the final review for the last chapter or epilogue of a book they've committed to reading. Skip chapters? No bonus. Offer up 50% or more as regular reviews? No bonus. But...if a reader offers an inline review for every chapter, including prologue and epilogue, they are rewarded with a lump sum equal to the number of chapters in the book (but only if they do reviews of ALL chapters.)

So...under this system, if you had submitted an inline review for every chapter in my Book II INTO THE WELL, you would have received a lump payment of 54 credits for your efforts. That may seem like a large amount but considering it may cost you 10 or more points to post a long chapter but you only receive 3 if you're lucky for reviewing an exceptionally long chapter, I think it would balance out in the end.

There you have it...the fruits of my massive brain power at work. What say you?

Bobbie

Re: Suggestion to Improve Reviews Received

100% agreed.

3 (edited by B Douglas Slack 2022-09-25 22:35:12)

Re: Suggestion to Improve Reviews Received

One flaw in the ointment is obvious, Bobbie. This has happened to me on several offings of my own. The first few chapters get quite a few in-line reviews, which is a good thing, pointing out things I should know better to have written down. However, as I progress (and learn from those reviews by not allowing the misteaks to creep into my chopters) there is a receding amount of flaws to point out (hopefully). Thus we have fewer in-line reviews.

There is also a requirement to find 5 points you wish to review in-line. There have been a few times I start out with an in-line review, find less than 5, and cancel out to opt for a normal review of 50 words or more. It never seemed fair to me to make questionable points simply to add up to five.

Like you, if I find a story I wish to follow all the way through, it could very well be that I "catch up" by reading, say, three chapters and then commenting (with 50 words or more) as a regular review of the third chapter instead of in-line.

There was another thread somewhere in this forum with a similar suggestion but I'll be darned if I can find it.

Bill

Re: Suggestion to Improve Reviews Received

B Douglas Slack wrote:

One flaw in the ointment is obvious, Bobbie. This has happened to me on several offings of my own. The first few chapters get quite a few in-line reviews, which is a good thing, pointing out things I should know better to have written down. However, as I progress (and learn from those reviews by not allowing the misteaks to creep into my chopters) there is a receding amount of flaws to point out (hopefully). Thus we have fewer in-line reviews.

There is also a requirement to find 5 points you wish to review in-line. There have been a few times I start out with an in-line review, find less than 5, and cancel out to opt for a normal review of 50 words or more. It never seemed fair to me to make questionable points simply to add up to five.

Like you, if I find a story I wish to follow all the way through, it could very well be that I "catch up" by reading, say, three chapters and then commenting (with 50 words or more) as a regular review of the third chapter instead of in-line.

There was another thread somewhere in this forum with a similar suggestion but I'll be darned if I can find it.

Bill

Hey Bill.  This is why I put in the caveat of "no more than 50% are regular reviews". And inline comments don't have to be nit picks or flaws or echoes or misplaced commas. I personally like comments about the characters' personalities, about plot twists, about descriptions, comments on whether the reader likes something or dislikes it. One can come up with all sorts of comments that may be helpful that aren't correcting anything but do fulfill the quota on number of comments to get the assigned points for the individual reading.

Thanks for chiming in

Re: Suggestion to Improve Reviews Received

Just taking a break from unpacking and saw this. Potential changes to the points system was hashed out in great detail about a year ago if I remember correctly. Sol eventually reviewed all the suggestions and felt that most of the suggestions would have added too much coding complexity and may not fix the real problem, which is that people drift off the site for a variety of reasons (life intrudes), some returning much later, others not. For my Connor story, I've only had four people finish the story so far, although a few more are now working their way through it.

Sol did say he was open to the idea of people being able to give each other points as gifts. That would allow me to put up a story and tell potential readers that I'll give them, say, ten points for every tenth chapter they finish, or in your case, you could offer fifty points if they read the whole thing. Of course, those points would have to come from your own stash, and not everyone has as many points as us old-timers.

A potential solution to the latter problem is to allow members to buy points (for cold hard cash) to gift to others on the site. I think it could add a little revenue for the site, and if someone is serious about getting their novels workshopped, then one would think they'd be willing to spend a few bucks to give points to their best reviewers. I'd gladly spend $10-$20 per reviewer to give points to each of my best reviewers who finish the book. This was one of the suggestions that Sol considered back during our previous discussion on the topic.

I still think a few minor points system enhancements like those mentioned above could have an impact in keeping reviewers, so I definitely recommend continuing to push for some since it's a pain point for most people on the site, although not everyone agrees if those changes would work.

Of course, we won't know if we don't try some of them, especially the easier ones.

I return now to my boxes and box cutters. And, Bobbie, I will review you as soon as I return to the site on a regular basis. I don't want to fall behind.

Dirk

Re: Suggestion to Improve Reviews Received

The only solution I've come up with in lieu of site changes, is making a very long end-of-story survey packed with backstory and story notes that are optional to read but offer a big chonk of points. Still not a great solution. The gifting of points (and then listing on our profiles how many points we'll gift for completion of certain books) would be very helpful.

Re: Suggestion to Improve Reviews Received

I like the idea of gifting points. I think there might be a way to initially test this without complex coding. Let me think through this We did allow people to buy points at one point and it was a relatively successful experiment. Gifting would just take that one step further.

- Sol

Re: Suggestion to Improve Reviews Received

Bobbie.R.Byrd wrote:
B Douglas Slack wrote:

One flaw in the ointment is obvious, Bobbie. This has happened to me on several offings of my own. The first few chapters get quite a few in-line reviews, which is a good thing, pointing out things I should know better to have written down. However, as I progress (and learn from those reviews by not allowing the misteaks to creep into my chopters) there is a receding amount of flaws to point out (hopefully). Thus we have fewer in-line reviews.

There is also a requirement to find 5 points you wish to review in-line. There have been a few times I start out with an in-line review, find less than 5, and cancel out to opt for a normal review of 50 words or more. It never seemed fair to me to make questionable points simply to add up to five.

Like you, if I find a story I wish to follow all the way through, it could very well be that I "catch up" by reading, say, three chapters and then commenting (with 50 words or more) as a regular review of the third chapter instead of in-line.

There was another thread somewhere in this forum with a similar suggestion but I'll be darned if I can find it.

Bill

Hey Bill.  This is why I put in the caveat of "no more than 50% are regular reviews". And inline comments don't have to be nit picks or flaws or echoes or misplaced commas. I personally like comments about the characters' personalities, about plot twists, about descriptions, comments on whether the reader likes something or dislikes it. One can come up with all sorts of comments that may be helpful that aren't correcting anything but do fulfill the quota on number of comments to get the assigned points for the individual reading.

Thanks for chiming in

I would agree that finding five things to comment on should be a no brainer. If you can't find any "mistakes" then find something you particularly like and comment on that. This ain't rocket science folks. Take care. Vern

Re: Suggestion to Improve Reviews Received

SolN wrote:

I like the idea of gifting points. I think there might be a way to initially test this without complex coding. Let me think through this We did allow people to buy points at one point and it was a relatively successful experiment. Gifting would just take that one step further.

- Sol


I think gifting points is good and would welcome it as an option. However, I can see a potential problem. Say I offer 30 points as a bonus for anyone who reviews all the chapters of my posted book. If I end up with more readers than I have points to cover the bonuses I owe, then I have to default on the offer? Or will there be a way for me to purchase points to gift if I come up short? I personally am sitting on over 900 points at the moment which will last a considerable time if all I'm using them for is posting my own work. But they could go quickly if I offer nice chunks as reward bonuses and a whole lot of people chime in on reviews, expecting to get that bonus when they're done.

Am I over thinking it or is this a potential problem that would need to be addressed before starting a reward program?

Bobbie

10 (edited by Dirk B. 2022-09-28 22:54:52)

Re: Suggestion to Improve Reviews Received

Given my experience, you'll be hard-pressed to get ten people to review a whole book because of attrition. Worst case, offer 30 points to the first ten people who review the whole book. Of course, that means you may need to coax your reviewers into giving good feedback, otherwise you'll get drive-by-reviewers who only give five items of feedback on every chapter in a race to finish. You can put a warning into your content summary that those types of reviewers will not receive a gift. Or you can word it that you will give up to 30 points depending on your assessment of the quality of their reviews over the whole story. Naturally, that could seriously annoy some reviewers who think they should have received a bigger gift than you gave.

In other words, there are lots of ways you can structure the rewards you give, none of which will need to be hard-coded into software. I suspect the best ways to handle it will be adopted by more and more members over time. Survival of the fittest!

Still, I hope members can buy points, otherwise only those of us with a lifetime's worth of points will be able to use the gifting mechanism. <-- Hint, Sol, hint. :-)

Dirk

Re: Suggestion to Improve Reviews Received

I think the best way to gift points is for Sol to do it - for new members. Give them enough points to post a few chapters, then they’re on their own. You get points by reviewing. Duh. And the more you review, besides points accumulated, the more reviewers you get. I’ve posted ten novels here, chapter by chapter, and have over 4000 points, even though the points I got from reviewing a chapter amounted to about 1/5, on the average, what it cost me to post one. That creates the reviewing incentive, and integrity - and reputation as a reviewer - keeps those reviews meaningful to the recipient rather than being fly-bys. Sol could perhaps award more points per review (not sure what algorithm he uses now), to bring that fraction down a bit, but the system has worked for me over the years.

12 (edited by Seabrass 2022-10-03 02:42:13)

Re: Suggestion to Improve Reviews Received

Hello. As I once suggested a long time ago in a forum post far, far away... have one night a week or twice a month or whatever where reviews earn double points. At least once in a while the number of reviews might spike and help writers in revising mode.

Also, consider something along the lines of a Free-Post Friday. I work Friday evenings (off nights now) and the number of posts drops significantly on Fridays, for reasons I totally understand. Maybe a few hours of being able to publish for free would help keep the site busy week-round. I know I'd revise and republish some of my longest stuff, just to get fresh looks and reward newer members with a bevy of credits. Imagine my ten-credit story (Unpelted) getting republished for free, then a dozen reviewers dropping reviews on double-the-credits night! It'd bankrupt the site! Totes worth it, though.

Re: Suggestion to Improve Reviews Received

This is just an idea. Why not try forming review groups based on genre?
dags smile